document suitability of Metals for work in scala/scala repo
SethTisue opened this issue · 7 comments
I asked about this in two chat rooms, scala/contributors Gitter and internal Slack. I'll summarize here, and then we can use this ticket to collect further experience reports, tips, etc.
in response to me asking on Gitter:
- @bishabosha: "I use metals and vscode to develop on a fork of scala/scala, it takes about 8 minutes to warm up on the first time opening the project" (some discussion ensued about whether it's normal for it to take that long)
and when I asked on Slack:
- @lrytz: "it did work for me last time i tried, importing and basic functionality, both 2.12 and 2.13"
- but he also added: "for me the debugger is probably the killer feature (of IntelliJ). set a breakpoint somewhere deep in the type checker and click up the call graph to see how the tree is being handled, what branches are taken. break at an error message, etc. i use it all the time, also to learn parts of the codebase that i'm not familiar with"
- work on debugging support in Metals in underway, but it will be a while before it's anywhere near on par with IntelliJ; see https://github.com/scalacenter/advisoryboard/blob/master/proposals/022-jsr-45.md
- @eed3si9n observed that "for Metals, other complication specific to scala/scala might be we probably won't have the semanticdb in between major versions", but with 2.14 not happening, we may never have that problem
so that's what we have so far. it's good to know that at least two people have found it to work.
I use metals + vscode on windows. It takes a long time indexing. It also times out its connection during initialization. That's fine, just press "connect to build server" after a bit. Once it's done, navigation works great.
@Jasper-M is the problem 2.12.x specific? (fwiw, our typical 2.12.x workflow these days is to do the actual development on 2.13.x, then backport it)
is the problem 2.12.x specific?
Didn't find the courage yet to switch branches and go through the importing cycle again.
As you probably figured out I was in fact backporting a 2.13.x PR.
I used 😕 + ❤️ to mean "painful irony".

