Error in reliability(fit) : argument "items" is missing, with no default
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Hello, I had a syntax that was working perfectly fine before (with R version 3.6.1 and Lavaan version 0.65), in which I computed reliability on my model.
I have upgraded R to 4.3.1, lavaan to 0.6-15 and semTools to 0.5-6.920. The model (named "fit") is computed fine, along with the lavaan summary.
However, now the reliability function doesn't work anymore for me, and it displays:
Error in reliability(fit) : argument "items" is missing, with no default
Has something changed that may have created this?
Thanks
reliability()
never had an items=
argument, so I'm not sure what causes this. Perhaps a reproducible example would be informative (this is a common standard for posting issues).
Note also that I deprecated reliability()
last year, replacing it with compRelSEM()
. See its help page for details.
Thanks for your reply. I am not sure. I tried isolating the issue by loading only the necessary packages.
I think the issue came because of the package "psych".
When I load psych after semTools, it says that "reliability" is hidden because of semTools, and then using "reliability" gives the above error message.
If I only load semTools without psych, I get this message instead:
Error in ly[[i]] %*% ve[[i]] : non-conformable arguments
In addition: Warning message:
In (apply(ly[[i]], 2, sum)^2) * diag(ve[[i]]) :
longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length
I did not notice reliability was deprecated sorry.
compRelSEM works indeed, so I guess the issue can be closed.
From my understanding, Cronbach's Alpha can still be retrieved by using "tau.eq=TRUE"?
But what about AVE?
Thanks, have a nice day
Indeed, the psych package has its own reliability()
function that can conflict with semTools.
Cronbach's Alpha can still be retrieved by using "tau.eq=TRUE"?
Yes.
what about AVE?
That has never been a reliability estimate. There is a separate AVE()
function now.