Syntactical issue in taproot footnote 16

Question

Syntactical issue in taproot footnote 16

OrfeasLitos opened this issue 5 years ago · 2 comments

I don't understand what "digest computation avoids unnecessary hashing as opposed to BIP143 digests in which parts may be set zero and before hashing them" means. The last part of the sentence seems to have a syntactical error.

Answer 1 · 2019-12-10T23:47:01.000Z

@OrfeasLitos Is this addressed?

Answer 2 · 2019-12-11T13:37:02.000Z

Yes, now it's very clear.