sourcegraph/browser-extensions

No indication that C# support is experimental on the GitHub extension

felixfbecker opened this issue ยท 5 comments

From @JoshuaKGoldberg on August 14, 2018 17:33

Following #39 - as a user, it is very confusing to me that C# files randomly "don't work" (e.g. hover info takes a while to load, then has no content).

Is there some kind of UI that can explain that C# support is experimental? If not, should it be mentioned somewhere?

Also, are there plans (roadmaps?) for making C# support... not-experimental?

Copied from original issue: sourcegraph/codeintellify#40

@JoshuaKGoldberg we show a code intelligence status indicator in the top right:

image

image

Maybe we should make it more prominent.

From @JoshuaKGoldberg on August 14, 2018 17:49

Ah, I should be more specific - using the GitHub extension. Updated the title.

Ah, the same indicator should be on GitHub:

image

image

This is for Go, for some reason the extension fails to retrieve the status, while sourcegraph.com works.

I'll move this issue to the browser extension

@KattMingMing I'm assigning this to you since you introduced the codeintel status indicator to the browser ext afaik

๐ŸŽ‰ This issue has been resolved in version 1.10.3 ๐ŸŽ‰

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot ๐Ÿ“ฆ๐Ÿš€