Decide on how much more damage instant disasters should be over lasting disaster counterparts

[wylyandrews]

It's expected that instant disasters will do move damage immediately together, and lasting disasters will do low amounts of damage but can easily surpass instant disasters in damage dealt if they are not handled appropriately. The balancing question is, how much more 'powerful' should instant disasters should be?

I have the opinion instant disasters shouldn't do too much damage immediately, since their real 'danger' is the fact they front-load damage altogether. Since lasting disasters don't pose as immediate as a threat as an instant disaster, I would suggest that, on average, lasting disasters should be doing more damage then an instant disaster, since they don't pose immediate threats and can be dealt with more easily, since the city's population never drops too low at any given time.