Would a non-async call be possible?

[winterstein]

Expected Behavior

Would it be possible for an API that does a synchronous return (without using promises)? E.g.
StackTrace.getNow() -> array of stackframes

I understand that the results would be more limited, but probably still an improvement on the raw output from new Error().stack.

Context

This would let me use it in code where the thread/async flow has to remain as-is.

[eriwen]

stacktrace.js v1.3.0 added StackTrace.getSync() that returns an Array of StackFrames just as you want. This does not do any source maps or function name guessing.

Please reopen this issue if this functionality is insufficient for you.

[winterstein]

Hello Eric, Thanks for the fast reply! Sorry I missed that function. A minor suggestion: maybe include a reference to getSync() here? https://www.stacktracejs.com/#!/docs/stacktrace-js Thank you for making this project. Kind regards, - Daniel

[Venryx]

@winterstein Just wanted to mention that it is also possible to synchronously get the source-mapped stack-trace. It's not part of the API, but it's possible with some modifications. See here: #188

[winterstein]

Thanks - Daniel

…

On 11 April 2017 at 12:58, Stephen Wicklund ***@***.***> wrote: @winterstein <https://github.com/winterstein> Just wanted to mention that it is possible to synchronously get the source-mapped stack-trace. See here: #188 <#188> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#178 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPmsLCC_mS7Xh8HCbV0R1JzGwngq3pzks5ru2rzgaJpZM4LKdPu> .

-- -------------------------------------- Dr Daniel Winterstein Director Edinburgh +44 (0)772 5172 612 http://sodash.com http://sogrow.co.uk