Could it be extended to syntax objects?

Question

Could it be extended to syntax objects?

Closed this issue 4 years ago · 3 comments

I'm using this to compute diffs between racketgrammars, except a bunch of useful information is lost in converting to datums.

Answer 1 · 2020-07-23T09:05:36.000Z

This answer is "yes", although I'm doing an imperfect job of preserving properties and source location information is weird when it might come from two different places.

wilbowma@5998a98

Answer 2 · 2020-07-23T15:14:25.000Z

Cool. I'm happy to accept a PR.
Your commit message mentions a change in interface; is it backwards compatible?

Answer 3 · 2020-07-23T19:37:16.000Z

I generalized it slightly, but could make it backwards compatible. I also want to figure how how to merge source locations in a more sensible way (at least enough in a way that works for my use case), and abstract put some copy-pasted code. I’ll submit a PR then.

…

-- Sent from my phoneamajig

On Jul 23, 2020, at 08:14, Vincent St-Amour ***@***.***> wrote: Cool. I'm happy to accept a PR. Your commit message mentions a change in interface; is it backwards compatible? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.