stamparm/maltrail

[BUG] No results from Trail searx mouse over

emsofo opened this issue · 7 comments

emsofo commented

Describe the bug
Great stuff!! Just installed on a virtual instance of OPNSense 23.7.1_3 and seems to work except for one thing - when hovering over the Trail section - the searx results always say: "Sorry! we didn't find any results. Please use another query or search in more categories." - so seems broken ?!?.

How To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to HTTP GUI
  2. Hover mouse over "Trail" IP and wait for pop up box - which shows no results

Expected behavior
As described in the User Guide - expected proper search results

Screenshots
image

Environment:

  • Device: Proxmox based OPNSense instance 23.7.1_3 running latest plugin version
  • OS: BSD
  • OPNSense Plugin
  • Problematic Maltrail component: web-interface
  • Maltrail version: v0.59
MikhailKasimov commented

@mimugmail Hello! Please, take a look. Perhaps, it is just OPNSense plugin issue.

mimugmail commented

No, this comes from mailtrail itself.
If the contents are read from file (which I dont know) maybe we can check if its there

MikhailKasimov commented

No, this comes from mailtrail itself. If the contents are read from file (which I dont know) maybe we can check if its there

OK, thanks. Will try to play with it today in evening...

emsofo commented

As far as I can see - the hover over function calls up a serach website called "searx" and tries to perform a lookup on that IP address from the Trail - seems like the searx website doesn't function right or the api call from maltrail is wrong?!?

MikhailKasimov commented

Looks like the deal is not in Maltrail itself, but searx.nixnet.services only.

E.g. (just to compare):

https://searx.nixnet.services/search?q=8.8.8.8
https://searx.nixnet.services/search?q=91.195.240.94

emsofo commented

Looks like the deal is not in Maltrail itself, but searx.nixnet.services only.

E.g. (just to compare):

https://searx.nixnet.services/search?q=8.8.8.8 https://searx.nixnet.services/search?q=91.195.240.94

Agreed - so they have to find another backend search mechanism, because that feature is broken

  • 👍1
stamparm commented

p.s. it should be fixed for the moment. hard to find working searx server (or similar search engine) which allows showing of in-frame query results

  • 👍1