local infeasible on min x s.t. x = 1
svigerske opened this issue · 2 comments
svigerske commented
Worhp has problems to solve the GAMS model
variable obj;
obj.lo = -1000; obj.up = 1000;
obj.l = 1000;
equations defobje;
defobje.. obj =e= 1;
model lp01e /all/;
solve lp01e min obj using lp;
I am getting:
-------------------------------------------------------
This is WORHP 1.9-1, the European NLP-solver.
Use of WORHP is subject to terms and conditions.
Visit http://www.worhp.de for more information.
-------------------------------------------------------
Total number of variables ........................ 1
variables with lower bound only 0
variables with lower and upper bound 1
variables with upper bound only 0
Total number of box constraints .................. 2
Total number of other constraints ................ 1
equality constraints 1
inequality constraints with lower bound only 0
inequality constraints with lower and upper bound 0
inequality constraints with upper bound only 0
Gradient (user) 1/1 = 100.000%
Jacobian (user) 1/1 = 100.000%
Block BFGS with intersections (1-1)
Algorithm Sequential Quadratic Programming
NLP Method Merit Function QP Method Interior-Point
NLP MaxIter ********* QP MaxIter 80
LA solver MA97 (tol 1.0E-12, ref 10, ord METIS/AMD, scl none)
Tolerances:
Optimality (KKT) 1.00E-06 (1.0E-03) IP ComTol 2.00E-07
Feasibility 1.00E-06 (1.0E-03) IP ResTol 5.00E-08
Complementarity 1.00E-03
Timeout 1000.000 seconds
ITER OBJ CON KKT FLAGS ALPHA PEN |DX| TIME
[ 0| 19] 1.0000000000E+03 9.9900000000E+02 1.1000756384E-02 Bin 0.000E+00 1.000E+00 1.874E-02 0.000E+00
[ 1| 61] 7.8115819167E+02 7.8015819167E+02 2.8015043644E+02 Bin 1.000E+00 9.129E+00 2.188E+02 0.000E+00
[ 2| 6] 3.0896798632E+02 3.0796798632E+02 3.5814899594E+02 Bin 1.000E+00 5.043E+00 4.722E+02 0.000E+00
[ 3| 2] 1.0102237347E+01 9.1022373470E+00 8.2264899273E+02 Bin 1.000E+00 1.100E+01 2.989E+02 0.000E+00
[ 4| 5] 1.0000000003E+00 2.6851232349E-10 2.4827299758E-01 Bfn 1.000E+00 1.100E+01 9.102E+00 0.000E+00
[ 5| 1] 9.9998847512E-01 1.1524883766E-05 2.6068988734E-02 Ban 8.950E-01 1.100E+01 1.288E-05 0.000E+00
[ 6| 1] 9.9998712299E-01 1.2877012467E-05 3.3399062205E-07 Bao 1.000E+00n 1.100E+01 1.352E-06 0.000E+00
[ 7| 1] 9.9998712299E-01 1.2877014332E-05 3.5260870834E-07 Bao 1.000E+00 1.100E+01 1.865E-12 0.000E+00
[ 8| 1] 9.9998712299E-01 1.2877014280E-05 3.5917983676E-07 Bao 1.000E+00 1.100E+01 5.151E-14 0.000E+00
Worhp: Local point of infeasibility.
Final values after iteration 6:
Final objective value ............. 9.9998712299E-01
Final constraint violation ........ 1.2877012467E-05
Final KKT conditions .............. 3.3399062205E-07
Terminating: Converged to local point of infeasibility.
Successful termination: Acceptable Solution Found in previous iteration.
The starting point seems to be crucial. When removing obj.l = 1000 (so 0 will be used), then it works fine.
renkekuhlmann commented
I am afraid this is an issue of WORHP and not the GAMS WORHP interface. The problem is, that WORHP currently does not assume problems to be linear and performs regularizations and relaxations that are suitable for nonlinear problems by default. We plan to fix this in the next release.
renkekuhlmann commented
Ah, found a way to disable the relaxation within the interface.