Manual installation without miniconda
Opened this issue · 3 comments
Hi! Is there a way to get rid of the miniconda setup? The python dependencies seem to be defined with the requirement.txt file, so it would theoretically be possible to manage the environment differently. You are using the FLAMETWML_MINICONDA
to activate the conda environment from within the code, but could it be replaced by a subprocess.call
instead? (or a thead).
import threading
import subprocess
class Worker(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
command_wrapper = os.path.join(self.framework.bundle_path, 'command_wrapper.py')
subprocess.Popen(
'python {} {}'.format(command_wrapper, lockfile_path),
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE
)
worker = Worker()
worker.start()
Hi Buddly, miniconda was a quick way to create isolaited python3 environment as Flame used to run python2.7 prior to 2022 release. One of the ways to get rid of miniconda completely would probvably be to compile those four python scrips that's been called from Flame script into ststic binaries, that'd probably work without breaking the compatibility with releases prior to 2022
Hi Talosh..... I think that would be a good idea. Now that Flame is python3 native, simplifying the install process would be great.
One of the ways to get rid of miniconda completely would probvably be to compile those four python scrips that's been called from Flame script into ststic binaries, that'd probably work without breaking the compatibility with releases prior to 2022
Maybe one less intrusive installation process would be to just request a path to a Python 3 executable? Maybe via a FLAMETWML_PYTHON_EXE
environment variable? I understand the need to maintain compatibility with older flame versions, but embedding a full conda environment for one plugin is a bit hardcore :)