Why prelurn not prelearn
kayakwest opened this issue · 2 comments
kayakwest commented
Is this going to be confusing in the suite of other *learn utilities? I'm ok with it if it was deliberate.
jo-tham commented
it was prelu(de) + (lea)rn
@kayakwest i didn't want to use learn, since this can be used without any intention to do machine learning afterwards.
i can see how it may be confusing, though... the only other thing is that in the future I think we can have just learn
, no rlearn
or pylearn
- that might help.
if a name change is favoured, I would go for something more generic related to 'exploratory data analysis ' or 'data summaries'.
thoughts?
jo-tham commented
closing. this will probably later become a module in learn package