tesera/prelurn

Why prelurn not prelearn

kayakwest opened this issue · 2 comments

Is this going to be confusing in the suite of other *learn utilities? I'm ok with it if it was deliberate.

it was prelu(de) + (lea)rn

@kayakwest i didn't want to use learn, since this can be used without any intention to do machine learning afterwards.

i can see how it may be confusing, though... the only other thing is that in the future I think we can have just learn, no rlearn or pylearn- that might help.

if a name change is favoured, I would go for something more generic related to 'exploratory data analysis ' or 'data summaries'.

thoughts?

closing. this will probably later become a module in learn package