Ternary warning inside class
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Happens if a ternary is inside a class method and contains a this property assignment.
Maybe it is a bug of AHK rather than the extension.
In the above picture, the , operator has lower precedence than ?:. So it will throw.
Therefore, a := between ?: without parentheses should throw too.
Maybe it is a bug of AHK rather than the extension.
Your code example is flawed. You've included a multi-statement inside your ternary without putting it in parentheses.
(1) ? (2, (this.xx:=32)) : 0
Maybe it is a bug of AHK rather than the extension.
Your code example is flawed. You've included a multi-statement inside your ternary without putting it in parentheses.
(1) ? (2, (this.xx:=32)) : 0
Yes. And the same is to this.b:=1.
But I already know what I mistook.😀
