lxml module status
Closed this issue · 1 comments
c00kiemon5ter commented
The defusedxml.lxml
module states that it is an example. What would make this module better?
I see some things around the lxml
parser that seem to be in question, like whether the remove_comments
option should be enabled by default, or whether comments should be blacklisted. Do you have an opinion on those, especially in relation to the latest saml vulnerability by duo?
tiran commented
The defusedxml.lxml
module was never designed as production code. As you said it's merely an example and proof of concept. I have neither interest, motivation, nor resources to deal with lxml. There I have deprecated the module in the upcoming 0.6 release and plan to remove it in 0.7.
Any security issue should be fixed in lxml instead.