tna0y/Python-random-module-cracker

Accuracy in README seems inaccurate.

your-diary opened this issue · 1 comments

According to the README.md,

Accuracy

Cracker is not absolutely accurate. It is able to perform close to 100% accurate on first 624 32-bit generations, ~99.5% on the first 1 000, ~95% on the first 10 000 and then figures drop to ~50% accurate to generation 50 000.

but I think this is the value of total (or accumulated) accuracy.

When I plot the accuracy of recent 100 predictions, the plot drops much faster than the total accuracy. And IMHO this is a more appropriate measure when discussing prediction accuracy.

a

Though I do not think what is written in README.md is wrong, I think it is a bit confusive.

tna0y commented

The issue has been fixed in the latest update thanks to @mcfx