Revise Button behavior
boerge1 opened this issue · 6 comments
Proposal: change the button behavior the same as the fork of Thomas-Lehnert:
three Button
============
vol/next-prev inverted
admin-menu idle pause play play
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
pause select play pause pause
pauseLong end adm shutdown shutdown track# track#
up next next vol++
upLong next 10 shortcut2 shortcut2 vol++ cont. next
down prev prev vol--
downLong prev 10 shortcut3 shortcut3 vol-- cont. prev
updownLong shortcut1 shortcut1
five Button
===========
vol/next-prev inverted has no effect for 5 Buttons
admin-menu idle pause play
-----------------------------------------------------------
pause select play pause
pauseLong end adm shutdown shutdown track#
up next next
upLong next 10 shortcut2 shortcut2 next 10
down prev prev
downLong prev 10 shortcut2 shortcut3 prev 10
updownLong shortcut1 shortcut1
four next vol++
fourLong next 10 vol++ cont.
five prev vol--
fiveLong prev 10 vol-- cont.
comments are welcome
edit: changed table above according to comments on http://discourse.voss.earth/t/tester-gesucht-tonuino-3-1/12086/90?u=boerge1
edit: changed table again (add continuously increase/decrease volume if long press)
edit: implement shutdown on pauseLong (the shortcut is now on updownLong
Made a first implementation on branch 'issue_028'.
I tried that but I wish we had
3-btn, not inverted:
Play upLong vol++ cont. and Play downLong vol-- cont. (see #24 and d75ada2#r90991535).
vol/next-prev inverted has no effect for 5 Buttons
Should the respective section be removed from the admin menu then?
I tried that but I wish we had 3-btn, not inverted: Play upLong vol++ cont. and Play downLong vol-- cont. (see #24 and d75ada2#r90991535).
Oh, you already did that, I didn't notice until I just tried to change the behavior. 😆 Maybe you should say so in the comment.
Ah, no, I flashed the wrong branch.