Confused about license
Closed this issue · 3 comments
pyfisch commented
The LICENSE file contains the Mozilla Public License 2.0 while in Cargo.toml the license is given as "MIT/Apache-2.0".
Guide for license field: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=license#the-license-and-license-file-fields I assume MPL was the intended license, then MPL-2.0 is the correct value for this field.
undef1nd commented
Good catch!
Gonna change it to MIT.
pyfisch commented
Any reason for not dual-licensing under Apache-2.0? It is the preferred combination in the Rust ecosystem and many/most crates use it.
- https://github.com/dtolnay/rust-faq#why-a-dual-mitasl2-license
- https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/necessities.html
I am not a lawyer and can't really comment on the differences between these licenses.
undef1nd commented
Same.
MIT looks like a more permissive https://choosealicense.com/licenses/ one. So yeah, I can do a dual license MIT/Apache