Overall discussion
vchrombie opened this issue ยท 11 comments
If you have any questions regarding the micro-tasks, you can report it here. I would be happy to answer them. ๐
Thank you @vchrombie for preparing the proposal. Could you open an issue per micro-task, so we can have a dedicate space to discuss each micro-task ? thank you
@aswanipranjal given your experience in working with Perceval, would you like to start the reviewing of the micro-tasks ? what do you think ? :)
Sure, @valeriocos. I will be doing it now. ๐
great! thank you @vchrombie for the prompt reply! :)
@valeriocos @aswanipranjal
I have a doubt, is it good to have the microtasks code with OOPS in python? Like Class and methods.
Currently, I wrote the code just by defining functions and showing the results in the end, like a python script.
I see that the final implementations are in a perfect OOPS manner. So, I was thinking if I can write the microtasks using OOPS, it would be a good.
What do you say? @valeriocos @aswanipranjal
@valeriocos, @vchrombie, sorry about the late reply.
@vchrombie I'll be reviewing the tasks shortly. Mean while, the OOPs approach sounds reasonable, so I think you can go ahead with that.
@valeriocos, @vchrombie, sorry about the late reply.
No issues. ๐
@vchrombie I'll be reviewing the tasks shortly. Mean while, the OOPs approach sounds reasonable, so I think you can go ahead with that.
Thanks for the suggestion @aswanipranjal.
@vchrombie I'll be reviewing the tasks shortly. Mean while, the OOPs approach sounds reasonable, so I think you can go ahead with that.
@aswanipranjal, I completed this for microtask 3, 4, 5, 6. I will be doing for the remaining two.
Please review them when you get free time. ๐
@valeriocos @aswanipranjal
I would like to ask if there are any comments or suggestions for the microtasks. You can have a look if you are free.
I know the GSoC submissions are over but there is always time for improvement. ๐
Thank you @vchrombie for the effort, the microtasks and the explanations look good.
As a minor comment, you could modify the formatting of microtask-6
in the List of microtasks, since in the current status it seems that the task wasn't completed. Probably this formatting would be better:
- microtask-6 (optional)
what do you think ?
Closing all the issues in this repo. ๐