Bug: FuzzyyBuffers doesn't list buffers added with :badd

[sindrom91]

I noticed that after loading a previously saved Vim session, FuzzyyBuffers would show just the currently opened file instead of all the files that are listed with :ls. The reason seems to be that they are added to Vim using :badd.

[okayno14]

Got similar issue. If:

• open vim
• open file A with FuzzyFile
• open file B with FuzzyFile
• call FuzzyBuffers,
  then in list appears only current buffer, when :ls shows all of them

[Donaldttt]

This is because when you open a session, all the buffers is listed but not loaded(behavior of :badd). You can solve this by changing line 62 of autoload/fuzzy/buffers.vim

var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 1})

into

var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 0})

However, this will cause some undesired buffer such as Vista be loaded if you use such plugin.
I am investigating if there is a perfect solution. Suggestions are welcome.

[Donaldttt]

Got similar issue. If:

• open vim
• open file A with FuzzyFile
• open file B with FuzzyFile
• call FuzzyBuffers,
  then in list appears only current buffer, when :ls shows all of them

I didn't run into this bug. Did you open file using enter key or ctrl-v in FuzzyFiles?

[okayno14]

Got similar issue. If:

• open vim
• open file A with FuzzyFile
• open file B with FuzzyFile
• call FuzzyBuffers,
  then in list appears only current buffer, when :ls shows all of them

I didn't run into this bug. Did you open file using enter key or ctrl-v in FuzzyFiles?

Files was opened by pressing enter. Behaviour changed if replace
getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 0})
to
getbufinfo() or getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1})

[Donaldttt]

Got similar issue. If:

• open vim
• open file A with FuzzyFile
• open file B with FuzzyFile
• call FuzzyBuffers,
  then in list appears only current buffer, when :ls shows all of them

I didn't run into this bug. Did you open file using enter key or ctrl-v in FuzzyFiles?

Files was opened by pressing enter. Behaviour changed if replace getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 0}) to getbufinfo() or getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1})

I see. Since the the original code snippet is

var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 1})

I guess this is a bug introduced after you modified the code?

[okayno14]

Got similar issue. If:

• open vim
• open file A with FuzzyFile
• open file B with FuzzyFile
• call FuzzyBuffers,
  then in list appears only current buffer, when :ls shows all of them

I didn't run into this bug. Did you open file using enter key or ctrl-v in FuzzyFiles?

Files was opened by pressing enter. Behaviour changed if replace getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 0}) to getbufinfo() or getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1})

I see. Since the the original code snippet is

var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 1})

I guess this is a bug introduced after you modified the code?

No. Bug appeared with original code, i modified it and problem gone. GitDiff from my fork:

-    var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1, 'bufloaded': 1})
+    var buf_data = getbufinfo({'buflisted': 1})

[Donaldttt]

Please check the latest commit. FuzzyBuffer will display unloaded buffer now. And you can exclude any undesired buffers by define g:fuzzyy_buffers_exclude global variable.

[okayno14]

Please check the latest commit. FuzzyBuffer will display unloaded buffer now. And you can exclude any undesired buffers by define g:fuzzyy_buffers_exclude global variable.

Good. I'll check it out. I've done feature with custom ignore list for find, powershell, fd. Can i push it to main branch (pull request ofk)?

[Donaldttt]

Please check the latest commit. FuzzyBuffer will display unloaded buffer now. And you can exclude any undesired buffers by define g:fuzzyy_buffers_exclude global variable.

Good. I'll check it out. I've done feature with custom ignore list for find, powershell, fd. Can i push it to main branch (pull request ofk)?

PRs are always welcomed! I am happy to check it out.

[sindrom91]

Works great, thanks! I didn't check the exclude option though.