Consider adding TryMap extension methods

[petre-c]

Currently, Map functions wrap the Func<T,K> in Result.Success(...)

This is problematic if the func raises an exception.

Please consider adding similar methods for TryMapping (i.e. wrapping the func in Result.Try(...))

[hankovich]

For me the proposed method sounds like a case for Bind (i.e. Map that potentially maps value to error is not actually Map).

How about result.Bind(value => Result.Try(() => func(value))) as a workaround?

[petre-c]

For me the proposed method sounds like a case for Bind (i.e. Map that potentially maps value to error is not actually Map).

OK, agreed.

How about result.Bind(value => Result.Try(() => func(value))) as a workaround?

What about TryBind instead of TryMap to avoid Result.Try-ing, so this

result.Bind(value => Result.Try(() => func(value)))

would be

result.TryBind(value => () => func(value))

[vkhorikov]

@petrechitashvili The new extension looks good to me. But I think BindTry is a better name here: we are binding the result of an inner Try call, as opposed to trying (i.e. invoking a method that may throw) a Bind method.

[hankovich]

I'm sure the issue may be closed as implemented