vkhorikov/CSharpFunctionalExtensions

Any plans to support ValueTask<T>?

Closed this issue · 6 comments

JMPSequeira commented

Hey,

Just like the title says.

vkhorikov commented

Not sure about that (yet). Will need to investigate what's needed for this to happen.

cportwood commented

Simple support should be a copy of Async files with Task changed to ValueTask removing the DefaultAwait if we just wish to allow for basic support for now since ConfigureAwait does work differently in ValueTask allowing you to be returned to a different synchronization context. The user can still use configure await if needed.

I could work on that and let the community play with the branch?

vkhorikov commented

Sounds good, please feel free to submit a PR. (We can start with just a couple of extension methods, to kick off a discussion.)

cportwood commented

Will do! I will get started on that this week. It is my birthday today so I will probably get to it later this week or this weekend. I like the idea of starting with a few extension methods for discussion. It will give the community an example to use for feedback.

vkhorikov commented

Sounds great. Happy birthday!

hankovich commented

I'm sure the issue may be closed as implemented

  • 👍1