w3c/activitystreams

Add to criteria for "Process for Including Extensions in Activity Streams 2.0"?

torgo opened this issue · 1 comments

torgo commented

Please Indicate One:

  • Editorial
  • Question
  • Feedback
  • Blocking Issue
  • Non-Blocking Issue

Please Describe the Issue:

As discussed in the CG meeting today, would it make sense to add to the criteria anything around I18N, A11Y or security / privacy review? As an example, in TAG we ask people to fill in this issue template when they request a review. I'm not suggesting you need to do anything as heavy-weight as that, but something lighter weight around these topics might be appropriate.

evanp commented

@torgo so, I added a section to the criteria for doing security, privacy, a11y and i18n reviews.