EO comments: In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following

[ruoxiran]

This issue split from #199 -3
In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following (with their potential updates from the COGA TF):
• The Business Case for Digital Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/
• Older Users and Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/
In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences introduction that points to the following (with their updates from the COGA TF):
• Cognitive and learning disabilities section of Diverse Abilities and Barriers in How People with Disabilities Use the Web https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers/#cognitive
• (maybe) Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/
. In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following (with their potential updates from the COGA TF):
• Involving Users in Web Projects for Better, Easier Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning/involving-users/
• Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/involving-users/
• (and maybe Planning and Managing Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning-and-managing/ )

[sharronrush]

@rachaelbradley @lseeman Discussion of 11 January led to agreement to add referential sentences in specific sections of Content Usable that point to WAI resources. Would it be acceptable/useful for EO to draft suggested wording for those pointer sentences within the Bus/Policy section and the Usability section?

[rachaelbradley]

We welcome suggested text and will bring it to the COGA meeting for discussion once you provide it. Thank you!

…

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:35 PM sharronrush ***@***.***> wrote: @rachaelbradley <https://github.com/rachaelbradley> @lseeman <https://github.com/lseeman> Discussion of 11 January led to agreement to add referential sentences in specific sections of *Content Usable* that point to WAI resources. Would it be acceptable/useful for EO to draft suggested wording for those pointer snetences? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#203 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBUPBVABK4EULDDB4ZGXWLSZXKX3ANCNFSM4S4EYLEQ> .

[shawna-slh]

From EOWG Survey Unaddressed Issues [UPDATED question]

Several links were added throughout the document. Maybe not all?

[rachaelbradley]

We have added the links agreed to in the joint chair calls and are happy to explore adding others to our developer resource pages which are outside of the document.