Title of the document...

[iherman]

At present, it says "application/did+cbor v1.0". Besides being unusual, I am not even sure it would not create problem to have it in our TR collection...

I would propose something more human readable:-)

[msporny]

I would propose something more human readable:-)

Other options include:

• CBOR DID Document Representation
• The did+cbor Representation (slightly less human readable)
• CBOR-encoded DID Documents (but what about CBOR-LD?)

Other options...?

[iherman]

I am being conservative, and would opt for the first option.

[msporny]

We can't use the first option because there are at least two CBOR representations... with at least one of them implemented (did+ld+cbor)... I went with the second option as it was the most accurate human-readable one.

Fixed in bdcc052