Question regarding WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1, and WCAG 2

Question

Closed this issue 6 years ago · 3 comments

I find this labeling a bit confusing. WCAG 2 could cause confusion, looks as though 2.1 is not included in 2

Answer 1 · 2018-09-13T08:22:56.000Z

@slhenry What do you think?

Answer 2 · 2018-09-13T17:45:22.000Z

This is an open issue site-wide. Hopefully we'll get it addressed in Sept...

Answer 3 · 2018-10-21T21:36:56.000Z

We will use “WCAG” (no version number) when it is insignificant if WCAG 2.0 or 2.1 is meant. (WCAG 1 is in the process of being marked obsolete.)