Cannot run lein-cljfmt with v0.9.1.
ntersol-tom opened this issue · 3 comments
ntersol-tom commented
Just updated to v.0.9.1 from v0.9.0, and now this happens:
$ lein cljfmt check
clojure.lang.ArityException: Wrong number of args (1) passed to: cljfmt.main/merge-default-options
at clojure.lang.AFn.throwArity (AFn.java:429)
clojure.lang.AFn.invoke (AFn.java:32)
leiningen.cljfmt$cljfmt.invokeStatic (cljfmt.clj:30)
leiningen.cljfmt$cljfmt.doInvoke (cljfmt.clj:21)
clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke (RestFn.java:425)
clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper (AFn.java:156)
clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo (RestFn.java:132)
clojure.lang.Var.applyTo (Var.java:705)
clojure.core$apply.invokeStatic (core.clj:669)
clojure.core$apply.invoke (core.clj:662)
leiningen.core.main$partial_task$fn__7380.doInvoke (main.clj:284)
clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo (RestFn.java:139)
clojure.lang.AFunction$1.doInvoke (AFunction.java:31)
clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo (RestFn.java:137)
clojure.core$apply.invokeStatic (core.clj:669)
clojure.core$apply.invoke (core.clj:662)
leiningen.core.main$apply_task.invokeStatic (main.clj:334)
leiningen.core.main$apply_task.invoke (main.clj:320)
leiningen.core.main$resolve_and_apply.invokeStatic (main.clj:343)
leiningen.core.main$resolve_and_apply.invoke (main.clj:336)
leiningen.core.main$_main$fn__7469.invoke (main.clj:453)
leiningen.core.main$_main.invokeStatic (main.clj:442)
leiningen.core.main$_main.doInvoke (main.clj:439)
clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo (RestFn.java:137)
clojure.lang.Var.applyTo (Var.java:705)
clojure.core$apply.invokeStatic (core.clj:667)
clojure.main$main_opt.invokeStatic (main.clj:514)
clojure.main$main_opt.invoke (main.clj:510)
clojure.main$main.invokeStatic (main.clj:664)
clojure.main$main.doInvoke (main.clj:616)
clojure.lang.RestFn.applyTo (RestFn.java:137)
clojure.lang.Var.applyTo (Var.java:705)
clojure.main.main (main.java:40)
weavejester commented
Apologies for that. My tests were using an older version of cljfmt.main, so I didn't notice the error before releasing. I'll have it fixed in a minute or two.
weavejester commented
Fixed in 0.9.2.
ntersol-tom commented
Can confirm. Thank you!