Feature Request: Add Support Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Ungoogled Chromium features (in progress), WebGPU for D3D9 renderer, Manifest V2 (once removed by Google) for Supermium 137/138
Closed this issue ยท 21 comments
Is your feature request related to a future? Please describe.
A add support Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Ungoogled Chromium features (in progress), WebGPU for D3D9 renderer, Manifest V2 (once removed by Google) for Supermium 138 and concise description of what the August is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
This is too much, the devs are people too!
Add support for my room's window please.
Is your feature request related to a future? Please describe. A add support Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Ungoogled Chromium features (in progress), WebGPU for D3D9 renderer, Manifest V2 (once removed by Google) for Supermium 138 and concise description of what the August is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
This is already too exaggerated.
Make all this by yourself my guy.
@Laurpower721 Sorry for not making you laugh with this joke. Not everyone gets it, I guess.
Is your feature request related to a future? Please describe. A add support Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Ungoogled Chromium features (in progress), WebGPU for D3D9 renderer, Manifest V2 (once removed by Google) for Supermium 138 and concise description of what the August is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
you forgot pcdos and j2me phones
also we need run supermium on nintendods and ัrะตgnะฐnัั test! ๐คฃ
@NS-Clone The DS and 3DS versions would just be homebrews only, as their store fronts are no longer available. Supermium would be better off trying to do mobile versions of their browser, which even then, they're not willing to do so.
@DAVIDLUCAS688 Windows ME and Windows 2000 would be the farthest back they would go, due to lack of support, especially if they go back farther than that.
For the Ungoogled Chromium features you're demanding, which ones specifically? Plus, since you're demanding that they support as far back as Windows 95, do you advocate for built-in Golpher Protocol to be integrated into the Ungoogled Supermium Mode or do you want it as an optional, Ungoogled Chromium Flag?
For Manifest V2, we know that will eventually be added within the future, which they specified only when all Manifest V2 distributions of Chromium are discontinued.
You've asked for something VERY similar and got shot down then too.
9x SUPPORT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. STOP ASKING FOR IT.
@Laurpower721 Sorry for not making you laugh with this joke. Not everyone gets it, I guess.
I get it, but i don't really like it i guess...
It is either trolling or a request to speed up the development, since those features have been sitting in "Future support" for years and no new ones have appeared there.
You opened a pull request to add to the readme that those operating systems are supported by Supermium, but failed to suggest any methods or workarounds to assist in that goal. Do you think that software functionality is directly determined by what is written in the readme?
However, I am thinking about dropping the WebGPU for D3D9 target. Those users may be better served by a solution such as WineD3D, but its functionality in Supermium would need to be evaluated.
I am thinking about dropping the WebGPU for D3D9 targe
NOOOooooOOOooooOOOOoooOOO!!!!1111!!!!!111
@win32ss If it wasn't for these troublemakers within this community keep nudging you and the staff to force out the feature, then it would had been considered to be added. Also, did the WebGPU for D3D9 target also kept failing the testing stages?
I think the developer must indicate that there won't be support anything older than XP (or 2000 although it's unnecessary) in the readme or something and whose open such requests should be banned from opening issues on this repository.
XP has NTFS 3.1, 2000 has NTFS 3.0, and NT 4 and below aren't even NT, why not just say Supports any NT version 5.1 or later, 9x will be dropped along with 2000 permanently
In theory, NT 3.51 should be considered too, but... do you really want it?
NT 4 and below are missing a lot of GDI capability. 3.51 doesn't even support SSE and it doesn't have a callback function in ntoskrnl to support an external driver that can context switch newer registers (like xmm/ymm/zmm)!
@nixxoq Another thing is that even if it was considered, a separate webpage for Supermium download that is pre-Windows XP would have to be made. The minimum browser version in order to download it, would have to be the very first release of IE and only on that browser. There would be virtually, minimal to no support for it.
@nixxoq Another thing is that even if it was considered, a separate webpage for Supermium download that is pre-Windows XP would have to be made. The minimum browser version in order to download it, would have to be the very first release of IE and only on that browser. There would be virtually, minimal to no support for it.
blahblahblah
so you somewhat install this pre XP
and not download browser for it?
LMAO
does even g00gle search works on this IE?
(also you will even stuck on new https)
so don't waste your time and others' time
now problem only with cloudflare
so download site must not be under it
or CF anytime can block any "outdated" FF140 browser...
@NS-Clone Dude, I'm just providing a theoretical scenario of what if it actually happened. Stop being mad at me for someone else's stupid and unreliable request that I'm just pointing out some of its key difficulties.
If you wanted to do testing, use this Windows 2000 virtual machine: https://copy.sh/v86/?profile=windows2000
From what I did so far, it was able to load Google on IE, Google was able to load on K-Meleon, but it was much slower and had two pop-ups regarding with the two scripts, just click continue in order to keep loading the page. For RetroZilla (Protoweb), Google loads, but it loads the retro one from 2000, so it appears that RetroZilla load sites of their archived versions from the Internet Archive. Github didn't load on IE and RetroZilla, but Github loaded on K-Meleon.
Regarding with the Supermium site, the https version doesn't work, because it's the main one, which I realized that K-Meleon could theoretically load it if there wasn't an untrusted connection warning. Even after clicking on the exemption, it still didn't work, so I removed the s from https and it works and I realized that the http one for the site on K-Meleon isn't the fallback site, unlike the ones for IE and RetroZilla, as it shows the main site instead.
I'm just providing a theoretical scenario
who cares about your theoretical sci-fi scenarios
about someones that wakeup from cryogenic sleep
turn on their PIII laptop
and try to download supermium from IE
...if even so
he takes old dvd from 2010 ๐คฃ
and install firefox from it
there is hundreds noname trolls like you
that wants supermium on windows 2.0, windows 1.0
and download it through bbs or by pigeon post
etc...
yep looks like g00gle still works on IE
(but they removed no java-script version long time ago)
but there is ZERO real scenarios
when some one SUDDENLY will run w2000 machine
and try to download supermium with IE
and in same time not have access to any more "modern" browser\machine
that can download it
it's impossible to imagine someone who still used IE
and not download more new browser from this IE
5, 10, 15 years ago
bcz many sites broken for IE since 201x
about CF it's real scenario
CF anytime can block any last official W7 browsers for example
or even say "w10 not more gets security updates from M$ so you maybe a bot"
but now this someone can download it directly from github
or from random other place
bcz last W7 browsers still pretty new