Don't limit the number of frequencies.
Closed this issue · 1 comments
GoogleCodeExporter commented
For a non-positional index, we don't need to artificially limit the number of
frequencies in an index to 64.
In fact, even for an index with positions, we can limit the number of positions
stored, but still store the original frequency.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by Roman.Kh...@gmail.com on 8 Jan 2011 at 2:26
GoogleCodeExporter commented
This issue was closed by revision r159.
Original comment by Roman.Kh...@gmail.com on 5 Feb 2011 at 8:48
- Changed state: Fixed