Why refuse what IBM is doing with DB2 for JDBC 4.1

[prrvchr]

Please don't be offended by my insistence on JDBC 4.1 support, this is only to improve your driver.

This request follows my PR which was refused and the production of a sqlite-jdbc archive compatible with JDBC 4.1.

If we look in detail at the JDBC 4.1 driver for DB2, we can see that their JDBC driver oversubscribes SQL commands passed to the driver. It suffixes all SQL commands starting with INSERT with SELECT FROM.

So my question is simple: Why refuse what IBM does in its driver and therefore refuse to port xerial sqlite-jdbc to JDBC 4.1?

[gotson]

We already stated the position of this driver.