xgao28/sta304_wk2

Peer Review (from Emily Su)

Opened this issue · 0 comments

Opening statement summary

The overall website is well done and I like the diverse amount of information you included in your website.

Strong positive points

The overall design of the website is clean and I like how you included the R demo page and a references section at the bottom of your home page.

Critical improvements needed

Some critical improvements you should make is updating your README.md to be a bit more informative.

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Currently there is lacking information about who you are as a person like what school you go to, your programs, etc.
  • I would add in a page or section for where we can contact you
  • I would add in some information about the purpose of the R demo page.

Evaluation:
This is a good start for a personal website!

Estimated mark:
65 out of 100.

Reason:
I would say that I like the design of your website but it currently lacks specific information about who you and where we can reach you.