GPL License for extension?
Opened this issue · 2 comments
GoogleCodeExporter commented
Hi Jeff,
Just wondering if you're completely set on the GPL for this extension.
I would dig to put into luabuild but since it does optional static linking even
LGPL would be an issue.
Not a big issue, really; I don't share the usual anti-GPL sentiment of many Lua
people.
steve d.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by steve.j....@gmail.com on 17 Apr 2012 at 1:48
GoogleCodeExporter commented
Hi, Steve -
Wow, I can't believe google never sent me any notification about this post!
So sorry, I completely missed it.
I am not a big fan of GPL, but this module incorporates a lot of code by other
authors that was previously released as GPL, so it looks like that's what we're
stuck with.
Apologies again for the *extremely* belated response,
- Jeff
Original comment by yetanoth...@gmail.com on 31 Jul 2014 at 5:24
GoogleCodeExporter commented
No problem, Jeff!
Better late than never - actually I'm no license bigot, GPL makes
sense in this case. (And some of lhf's modules are actually GPL
because of source code inclusion, even though he goes by the public
domain release)
Original comment by steve.j....@gmail.com on 1 Aug 2014 at 5:11