0.11 on pypi vs 0.10 here?

Question

0.11 on pypi vs 0.10 here?

Closed this issue 6 years ago · 3 comments

What I'm "really" trying to do is use angr with the ida loader, so my original idalink install was done with pip install angr. This repo appears to be clearly a further development, but at the same time cle used by angr seems to rely on argument names that are different in the two sources. Is the intention for cle to work with the latest idalink should the used by cle/angr/pypi be considered a fork?

Answer 1 · 2016-09-24T07:24:37.000Z

Ideally, idalink (this repo) should work with CLE as a loader backend, but we don't have any automated tests because IDA is IDA. As we very rarely use the IDA backend, it's possible that the projects diverged and CLE's interaction with idalink needs to be updated...

Answer 2 · 2017-01-01T07:02:44.000Z

I believe 0.11 on PyPI is from commit 7cea205 here.

Version numbers are a bit confusing; can I bump this repo to 0.12 to make it a bit more clear?

Answer 3 · 2017-01-05T17:52:34.000Z

Sure!

…

On Jan 1, 2017 12:02 AM, "David Manouchehri" ***@***.***> wrote: I believe 0.11 on PyPI is from commit 7cea205 <7cea205> here. Version numbers are a bit confusing; can I bump this repo to 0.12 to make it a bit more clear? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#17 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADSzl7J1Eor9gJ7Qyt_UkkottEWWBpkUks5rN0-UgaJpZM4KE30-> .