Behavior of receive-str on socket timeouts.

Question

Behavior of receive-str on socket timeouts.

ToBeReplaced opened this issue 11 years ago · 4 comments

Presently, receive-str will raise a NullPointerException if a timeout occurs after (.setReceiveTimeOut socket timeout). I believe that it should return nil. What is the correct behavior?

Answer 1 · 2013-08-06T16:17:16.000Z

That's better than a NullPointerException

Answer 2 · 2013-08-06T16:21:03.000Z

@ToBeReplaced Do you have a stacktrace?

Answer 3 · 2013-08-06T16:42:59.000Z

Just merged in a fix where it returns nil and added set-receive-timeout to the zmq.clj

Answer 4 · 2013-08-06T16:47:20.000Z

Thanks! I had just gotten a test case ready for you.