Extracted key seems wrong

[BenjaminSoelberg]

When compiling and running wbaes128_attack_the_boxes the following key is extracted:
\x30\x76\x65\x72\x63\x64\x30\x6b\x40\x64\x6f\x61\x72\x65\x2d\x65
The ascii version is : 0vercd0k@doare-e
I would have expected : 0vercl0k@doare-e

Is it possible that the method isn't 100% and more than one possible key should have been returned ?

[0vercl0k]

Thanks for spotting this Benjamin - sounds like I've wrote this code 2 years ago according to the github history so I am not able to answer your question from the top of my head; there just might be a bug in my code. I'll try to re read the associated post and see if I can debug this in the next two weeks! Cheers, Axel 2017-08-15 14:31 GMT-07:00 Benjamin Sølberg <notifications@github.com>:

…

When compiling and running wbaes128_attack_the_boxes the following key is extracted: \x30\x76\x65\x72\x63\x64\x30\x6b\x40\x64\x6f\x61\x72\x65\x2d\x65 The ascii version is : ***@***.*** I would have expected : ***@***.*** Is it possible that the method isn't 100% and more than one possible key should have been returned ? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABaHRRdj_tJOO6hxzakkghq6p48KeYIOks5sYg49gaJpZM4O4JH3> .

[0vercl0k]

Hey @BenjaminSoelberg - I fixed the issue you reported; basically I forgot a step when right shifting of 8 bits the second line of the matrix :). Also found this typo while debugging: 34dd7a9. D:\Codes\wbaes_attack\wbaes128\wbaes128_attack_the_boxes>D:\Codes\wbaes_attack\wbaes128\Release\wbaes128_attack_the_boxes.exe Key successfully extracted & UnShiftRow'd: \x30\x76\x65\x72\x63\x6c\x30\x6b\x40\x64\x6f\x61\x72\x65\x2d\x65 In [14]: '\x30\x76\x65\x72\x63\x6c\x30\x6b\x40\x64\x6f\x61\x72\x65\x2d\x65' Out[14]: '0vercl0k@doare-e' Cheers 2017-08-15 19:15 GMT-07:00 0vercl0k <0vercl0k@tuxfamily.org>:

…

Thanks for spotting this Benjamin - sounds like I've wrote this code 2 years ago according to the github history so I am not able to answer your question from the top of my head; there just might be a bug in my code. I'll try to re read the associated post and see if I can debug this in the next two weeks! Cheers, Axel 2017-08-15 14:31 GMT-07:00 Benjamin Sølberg ***@***.***>: > When compiling and running wbaes128_attack_the_boxes the following key is > extracted: > \x30\x76\x65\x72\x63\x64\x30\x6b\x40\x64\x6f\x61\x72\x65\x2d\x65 > The ascii version is : ***@***.*** > I would have expected : ***@***.*** > > Is it possible that the method isn't 100% and more than one possible key > should have been returned ? > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#6>, or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABaHRRdj_tJOO6hxzakkghq6p48KeYIOks5sYg49gaJpZM4O4JH3> > . >