YAPF
Introduction
Most of the current formatters for Python --- e.g., autopep8, and pep8ify --- are made to remove lint errors from code. This has some obvious limitations. For instance, code that conforms to the PEP 8 guidelines may not be reformatted. But it doesn't mean that the code looks good.
YAPF takes a different approach. It's based off of 'clang-format', developed by Daniel Jasper. In essence, the algorithm takes the code and reformats it to the best formatting that conforms to the style guide, even if the original code didn't violate the style guide. The idea is also similar to the 'gofmt' tool for the Go programming language: end all holy wars about formatting - if the whole codebase of a project is simply piped through YAPF whenever modifications are made, the style remains consistent throughout the project and there's no point arguing about style in every code review.
The ultimate goal is that the code YAPF produces is as good as the code that a programmer would write if they were following the style guide. It takes away some of the drudgery of maintaining your code.
Try out YAPF with this online demo.
Contents
Installation
To install YAPF from PyPI:
$ pip install yapf
(optional) If you are using Python 2.7 and want to enable multiprocessing:
$ pip install futures
YAPF is still considered in "alpha" stage, and the released version may change often; therefore, the best way to keep up-to-date with the latest development is to clone this repository.
Note that if you intend to use YAPF as a command-line tool rather than as a
library, installation is not necessary. YAPF supports being run as a directory
by the Python interpreter. If you cloned/unzipped YAPF into DIR
, it's
possible to run:
$ PYTHONPATH=DIR python DIR/yapf [options] ...
Python versions
YAPF supports Python 2.7 and 3.6.4+. (Note that some Python 3 features may fail to parse with Python versions before 3.6.4.)
YAPF requires the code it formats to be valid Python for the version YAPF itself runs under. Therefore, if you format Python 3 code with YAPF, run YAPF itself under Python 3 (and similarly for Python 2).
Usage
Options:
usage: yapf [-h] [-v] [-d | -i] [-r | -l START-END] [-e PATTERN] [--style STYLE] [--style-help] [--no-local-style] [-p] [-vv] [files [files ...]] Formatter for Python code. positional arguments: files optional arguments: -h, --help show this help message and exit -v, --version show version number and exit -d, --diff print the diff for the fixed source -i, --in-place make changes to files in place -r, --recursive run recursively over directories -l START-END, --lines START-END range of lines to reformat, one-based -e PATTERN, --exclude PATTERN patterns for files to exclude from formatting --style STYLE specify formatting style: either a style name (for example "pep8" or "google"), or the name of a file with style settings. The default is pep8 unless a .style.yapf or setup.cfg file located in the same directory as the source or one of its parent directories (for stdin, the current directory is used). --style-help show style settings and exit; this output can be saved to .style.yapf to make your settings permanent --no-local-style don't search for local style definition -p, --parallel Run yapf in parallel when formatting multiple files. Requires concurrent.futures in Python 2.X -vv, --verbose Print out file names while processing
Return Codes
Normally YAPF returns zero on successful program termination and non-zero otherwise.
If --diff
is supplied, YAPF returns zero when no changes were necessary, non-zero
otherwise (including program error). You can use this in a CI workflow to test that code
has been YAPF-formatted.
Excluding files from formatting (.yapfignore)
In addition to exclude patterns provided on commandline, YAPF looks for additional
patterns specified in a file named .yapfignore
located in the working directory from
which YAPF is invoked.
Formatting style
The formatting style used by YAPF is configurable and there are many "knobs"
that can be used to tune how YAPF does formatting. See the style.py
module
for the full list.
To control the style, run YAPF with the --style
argument. It accepts one of
the predefined styles (e.g., pep8
or google
), a path to a configuration
file that specifies the desired style, or a dictionary of key/value pairs.
The config file is a simple listing of (case-insensitive) key = value
pairs
with a [yapf]
heading. For example:
[yapf]
based_on_style = pep8
spaces_before_comment = 4
split_before_logical_operator = true
The based_on_style
setting determines which of the predefined styles this
custom style is based on (think of it like subclassing).
It's also possible to do the same on the command line with a dictionary. For example:
--style='{based_on_style: chromium, indent_width: 4}'
This will take the chromium
base style and modify it to have four space
indentations.
YAPF will search for the formatting style in the following manner:
- Specified on the command line
- In the
[style]
section of a.style.yapf
file in either the current directory or one of its parent directories. - In the
[yapf]
section of asetup.cfg
file in either the current directory or one of its parent directories. - In the
[style]
section of a~/.config/yapf/style
file in your home directory.
If none of those files are found, the default style is used (PEP8).
Example
An example of the type of formatting that YAPF can do, it will take this ugly code:
x = { 'a':37,'b':42,
'c':927}
y = 'hello ''world'
z = 'hello '+'world'
a = 'hello {}'.format('world')
class foo ( object ):
def f (self ):
return 37*-+2
def g(self, x,y=42):
return y
def f ( a ) :
return 37+-+a[42-x : y**3]
and reformat it into:
x = {'a': 37, 'b': 42, 'c': 927}
y = 'hello ' 'world'
z = 'hello ' + 'world'
a = 'hello {}'.format('world')
class foo(object):
def f(self):
return 37 * -+2
def g(self, x, y=42):
return y
def f(a):
return 37 + -+a[42 - x:y**3]
Example as a module
The two main APIs for calling yapf are FormatCode
and FormatFile
, these
share several arguments which are described below:
>>> from yapf.yapflib.yapf_api import FormatCode # reformat a string of code
>>> FormatCode("f ( a = 1, b = 2 )")
'f(a=1, b=2)\n'
A style_config
argument: Either a style name or a path to a file that contains
formatting style settings. If None is specified, use the default style
as set in style.DEFAULT_STYLE_FACTORY
.
>>> FormatCode("def g():\n return True", style_config='pep8')
'def g():\n return True\n'
A lines
argument: A list of tuples of lines (ints), [start, end],
that we want to format. The lines are 1-based indexed. It can be used by
third-party code (e.g., IDEs) when reformatting a snippet of code rather
than a whole file.
>>> FormatCode("def g( ):\n a=1\n b = 2\n return a==b", lines=[(1, 1), (2, 3)])
'def g():\n a = 1\n b = 2\n return a==b\n'
A print_diff
(bool): Instead of returning the reformatted source, return a
diff that turns the formatted source into reformatter source.
>>> print(FormatCode("a==b", filename="foo.py", print_diff=True))
--- foo.py (original)
+++ foo.py (reformatted)
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a==b
+a == b
Note: the filename
argument for FormatCode
is what is inserted into
the diff, the default is <unknown>
.
FormatFile
returns reformatted code from the passed file along with its encoding:
>>> from yapf.yapflib.yapf_api import FormatFile # reformat a file
>>> print(open("foo.py").read()) # contents of file
a==b
>>> FormatFile("foo.py")
('a == b\n', 'utf-8')
The in_place
argument saves the reformatted code back to the file:
>>> FormatFile("foo.py", in_place=True)
(None, 'utf-8')
>>> print(open("foo.py").read()) # contents of file (now fixed)
a == b
Knobs
ALIGN_CLOSING_BRACKET_WITH_VISUAL_INDENT
- Align closing bracket with visual indentation.
ALLOW_MULTILINE_LAMBDAS
- Allow lambdas to be formatted on more than one line.
ALLOW_MULTILINE_DICTIONARY_KEYS
Allow dictionary keys to exist on multiple lines. For example:
x = { ('this is the first element of a tuple', 'this is the second element of a tuple'): value, }
ALLOW_SPLIT_BEFORE_DEFAULT_OR_NAMED_ASSIGNS
- Allow splitting before a default / named assignment in an argument list.
ALLOW_SPLIT_BEFORE_DICT_VALUE
- Allow splits before the dictionary value.
ARITHMETIC_PRECEDENCE_INDICATION
Let spacing indicate operator precedence. For example:
a = 1 * 2 + 3 / 4 b = 1 / 2 - 3 * 4 c = (1 + 2) * (3 - 4) d = (1 - 2) / (3 + 4) e = 1 * 2 - 3 f = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
will be formatted as follows to indicate precedence:
a = 1*2 + 3/4 b = 1/2 - 3*4 c = (1+2) * (3-4) d = (1-2) / (3+4) e = 1*2 - 3 f = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
BLANK_LINE_BEFORE_NESTED_CLASS_OR_DEF
Insert a blank line before a
def
orclass
immediately nested within anotherdef
orclass
. For example:class Foo: # <------ this blank line def method(): pass
BLANK_LINE_BEFORE_MODULE_DOCSTRING
- Insert a blank line before a module docstring.
BLANK_LINE_BEFORE_CLASS_DOCSTRING
- Insert a blank line before a class-level docstring.
BLANK_LINES_AROUND_TOP_LEVEL_DEFINITION
Sets the number of desired blank lines surrounding top-level function and class definitions. For example:
class Foo: pass # <------ having two blank lines here # <------ is the default setting class Bar: pass
COALESCE_BRACKETS
Do not split consecutive brackets. Only relevant when
DEDENT_CLOSING_BRACKETS
is set. For example:call_func_that_takes_a_dict( { 'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 'value2', } )
would reformat to:
call_func_that_takes_a_dict({ 'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 'value2', })
COLUMN_LIMIT
- The column limit (or max line-length)
CONTINUATION_ALIGN_STYLE
The style for continuation alignment. Possible values are:
SPACE
: Use spaces for continuation alignment. This is default behavior.FIXED
: Use fixed number (CONTINUATION_INDENT_WIDTH) of columns (ie: CONTINUATION_INDENT_WIDTH/INDENT_WIDTH tabs) for continuation alignment.VALIGN-RIGHT
: Vertically align continuation lines with indent characters. Slightly right (one more indent character) if cannot vertically align continuation lines with indent characters.For options
FIXED
, andVALIGN-RIGHT
are only available whenUSE_TABS
is enabled.
CONTINUATION_INDENT_WIDTH
- Indent width used for line continuations.
DEDENT_CLOSING_BRACKETS
Put closing brackets on a separate line, dedented, if the bracketed expression can't fit in a single line. Applies to all kinds of brackets, including function definitions and calls. For example:
config = { 'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 'value2', } # <--- this bracket is dedented and on a separate line time_series = self.remote_client.query_entity_counters( entity='dev3246.region1', key='dns.query_latency_tcp', transform=Transformation.AVERAGE(window=timedelta(seconds=60)), start_ts=now()-timedelta(days=3), end_ts=now(), ) # <--- this bracket is dedented and on a separate line
DISABLE_ENDING_COMMA_HEURISTIC
- Disable the heuristic which places each list element on a separate line if the list is comma-terminated.
EACH_DICT_ENTRY_ON_SEPARATE_LINE
- Place each dictionary entry onto its own line.
I18N_COMMENT
- The regex for an internationalization comment. The presence of this comment stops reformatting of that line, because the comments are required to be next to the string they translate.
I18N_FUNCTION_CALL
- The internationalization function call names. The presence of this function stops reformatting on that line, because the string it has cannot be moved away from the i18n comment.
INDENT_DICTIONARY_VALUE
Indent the dictionary value if it cannot fit on the same line as the dictionary key. For example:
config = { 'key1': 'value1', 'key2': value1 + value2, }
INDENT_WIDTH
- The number of columns to use for indentation.
INDENT_BLANK_LINES
- Set to
True
to prefer indented blank lines rather than empty JOIN_MULTIPLE_LINES
- Join short lines into one line. E.g., single line
if
statements. NO_SPACES_AROUND_SELECTED_BINARY_OPERATORS
Do not include spaces around selected binary operators. For example:
1 + 2 * 3 - 4 / 5
will be formatted as follows when configured with
*
,/
:1 + 2*3 - 4/5
SPACES_AROUND_POWER_OPERATOR
- Set to
True
to prefer using spaces around**
. SPACES_AROUND_DEFAULT_OR_NAMED_ASSIGN
- Set to
True
to prefer spaces around the assignment operator for default or keyword arguments. SPACES_BEFORE_COMMENT
The number of spaces required before a trailing comment. This can be a single value (representing the number of spaces before each trailing comment) or list of of values (representing alignment column values; trailing comments within a block will be aligned to the first column value that is greater than the maximum line length within the block). For example:
With
spaces_before_comment=5
:1 + 1 # Adding values
will be formatted as:
1 + 1 # Adding values <-- 5 spaces between the end of the statement and comment
With
spaces_before_comment=15, 20
:1 + 1 # Adding values two + two # More adding longer_statement # This is a longer statement short # This is a shorter statement a_very_long_statement_that_extends_beyond_the_final_column # Comment short # This is a shorter statement
will be formatted as:
1 + 1 # Adding values <-- end of line comments in block aligned to col 15 two + two # More adding longer_statement # This is a longer statement <-- end of line comments in block aligned to col 20 short # This is a shorter statement a_very_long_statement_that_extends_beyond_the_final_column # Comment <-- the end of line comments are aligned based on the line length short # This is a shorter statement
SPACE_BETWEEN_ENDING_COMMA_AND_CLOSING_BRACKET
- Insert a space between the ending comma and closing bracket of a list, etc.
SPLIT_ARGUMENTS_WHEN_COMMA_TERMINATED
- Split before arguments if the argument list is terminated by a comma.
SPLIT_ALL_COMMA_SEPARATED_VALUES
- If a comma separated list (
dict
,list
,tuple
, or functiondef
) is on a line that is too long, split such that all elements are on a single line. SPLIT_ALL_TOP_LEVEL_COMMA_SEPARATED_VALUES
Variation on
SPLIT_ALL_COMMA_SEPARATED_VALUES
in which, if a subexpression with a comma fits in its starting line, then the subexpression is not split. This avoids splits like the one forb
in this code:- abcdef(
aReallyLongThing: int, b: [Int,
Int])
With the new knob this is split as:
- abcdef(
- aReallyLongThing: int, b: [Int, Int])
SPLIT_BEFORE_BITWISE_OPERATOR
- Set to
True
to prefer splitting before&
,|
or^
rather than after. SPLIT_BEFORE_ARITHMETIC_OPERATOR
- Set to
True
to prefer splitting before+
,-
,*
,/
,//
, or@
rather than after. SPLIT_BEFORE_CLOSING_BRACKET
- Split before the closing bracket if a
list
ordict
literal doesn't fit on a single line. SPLIT_BEFORE_DICT_SET_GENERATOR
Split before a dictionary or set generator (comp_for). For example, note the split before the
for
:foo = { variable: 'Hello world, have a nice day!' for variable in bar if variable != 42 }
SPLIT_BEFORE_DOT
Split before the
.
if we need to split a longer expression:foo = ('This is a really long string: {}, {}, {}, {}'.format(a, b, c, d))
would reformat to something like:
foo = ('This is a really long string: {}, {}, {}, {}' .format(a, b, c, d))
SPLIT_BEFORE_EXPRESSION_AFTER_OPENING_PAREN
- Split after the opening paren which surrounds an expression if it doesn't fit on a single line.
SPLIT_BEFORE_FIRST_ARGUMENT
- If an argument / parameter list is going to be split, then split before the first argument.
SPLIT_BEFORE_LOGICAL_OPERATOR
- Set to
True
to prefer splitting beforeand
oror
rather than after. SPLIT_BEFORE_NAMED_ASSIGNS
- Split named assignments onto individual lines.
SPLIT_COMPLEX_COMPREHENSION
For list comprehensions and generator expressions with multiple clauses (e.g multiple
for
calls,if
filter expressions) and which need to be reflowed, split each clause onto its own line. For example:result = [ a_var + b_var for a_var in xrange(1000) for b_var in xrange(1000) if a_var % b_var]
would reformat to something like:
result = [ a_var + b_var for a_var in xrange(1000) for b_var in xrange(1000) if a_var % b_var]
SPLIT_PENALTY_AFTER_OPENING_BRACKET
- The penalty for splitting right after the opening bracket.
SPLIT_PENALTY_AFTER_UNARY_OPERATOR
- The penalty for splitting the line after a unary operator.
SPLIT_PENALTY_ARITHMETIC_OPERATOR
- The penalty of splitting the line around the
+
,-
,*
,/
,//
,%
, and@
operators. SPLIT_PENALTY_BEFORE_IF_EXPR
- The penalty for splitting right before an
if
expression. SPLIT_PENALTY_BITWISE_OPERATOR
- The penalty of splitting the line around the
&
,|
, and^
operators. SPLIT_PENALTY_COMPREHENSION
- The penalty for splitting a list comprehension or generator expression.
SPLIT_PENALTY_EXCESS_CHARACTER
- The penalty for characters over the column limit.
SPLIT_PENALTY_FOR_ADDED_LINE_SPLIT
- The penalty incurred by adding a line split to the unwrapped line. The more line splits added the higher the penalty.
SPLIT_PENALTY_IMPORT_NAMES
The penalty of splitting a list of
import as
names. For example:from a_very_long_or_indented_module_name_yada_yad import (long_argument_1, long_argument_2, long_argument_3)
would reformat to something like:
from a_very_long_or_indented_module_name_yada_yad import ( long_argument_1, long_argument_2, long_argument_3)
SPLIT_PENALTY_LOGICAL_OPERATOR
- The penalty of splitting the line around the
and
andor
operators. USE_TABS
- Use the Tab character for indentation.
(Potentially) Frequently Asked Questions
Why does YAPF destroy my awesome formatting?
YAPF tries very hard to get the formatting correct. But for some code, it won't be as good as hand-formatting. In particular, large data literals may become horribly disfigured under YAPF.
The reasons for this are manyfold. In short, YAPF is simply a tool to help with development. It will format things to coincide with the style guide, but that may not equate with readability.
What can be done to alleviate this situation is to indicate regions YAPF should ignore when reformatting something:
# yapf: disable
FOO = {
# ... some very large, complex data literal.
}
BAR = [
# ... another large data literal.
]
# yapf: enable
You can also disable formatting for a single literal like this:
BAZ = {
(1, 2, 3, 4),
(5, 6, 7, 8),
(9, 10, 11, 12),
} # yapf: disable
To preserve the nice dedented closing brackets, use the
dedent_closing_brackets
in your style. Note that in this case all
brackets, including function definitions and calls, are going to use
that style. This provides consistency across the formatted codebase.
Why Not Improve Existing Tools?
We wanted to use clang-format's reformatting algorithm. It's very powerful and designed to come up with the best formatting possible. Existing tools were created with different goals in mind, and would require extensive modifications to convert to using clang-format's algorithm.
Can I Use YAPF In My Program?
Please do! YAPF was designed to be used as a library as well as a command line tool. This means that a tool or IDE plugin is free to use YAPF.
I still get non Pep8 compliant code! Why?
YAPF tries very hard to be fully PEP 8 compliant. However, it is paramount to not risk altering the semantics of your code. Thus, YAPF tries to be as safe as possible and does not change the token stream (e.g., by adding parenthesis). All these cases however, can be easily fixed manually. For instance,
from my_package import my_function_1, my_function_2, my_function_3, my_function_4, my_function_5
FOO = my_variable_1 + my_variable_2 + my_variable_3 + my_variable_4 + my_variable_5 + my_variable_6 + my_variable_7 + my_variable_8
won't be split, but you can easily get it right by just adding parenthesis:
from my_package import (my_function_1, my_function_2, my_function_3,
my_function_4, my_function_5)
FOO = (my_variable_1 + my_variable_2 + my_variable_3 + my_variable_4 +
my_variable_5 + my_variable_6 + my_variable_7 + my_variable_8)
Gory Details
Algorithm Design
The main data structure in YAPF is the UnwrappedLine
object. It holds a list
of FormatToken
s, that we would want to place on a single line if there were
no column limit. An exception being a comment in the middle of an expression
statement will force the line to be formatted on more than one line. The
formatter works on one UnwrappedLine
object at a time.
An UnwrappedLine
typically won't affect the formatting of lines before or
after it. There is a part of the algorithm that may join two or more
UnwrappedLine
s into one line. For instance, an if-then statement with a
short body can be placed on a single line:
if a == 42: continue
YAPF's formatting algorithm creates a weighted tree that acts as the solution space for the algorithm. Each node in the tree represents the result of a formatting decision --- i.e., whether to split or not to split before a token. Each formatting decision has a cost associated with it. Therefore, the cost is realized on the edge between two nodes. (In reality, the weighted tree doesn't have separate edge objects, so the cost resides on the nodes themselves.)
For example, take the following Python code snippet. For the sake of this example, assume that line (1) violates the column limit restriction and needs to be reformatted.
def xxxxxxxxxxx(aaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbb, cccccccc, dddddddd, eeeeee): # 1
pass # 2
For line (1), the algorithm will build a tree where each node (a
FormattingDecisionState
object) is the state of the line at that token given
the decision to split before the token or not. Note: the FormatDecisionState
objects are copied by value so each node in the graph is unique and a change in
one doesn't affect other nodes.
Heuristics are used to determine the costs of splitting or not splitting. Because a node holds the state of the tree up to a token's insertion, it can easily determine if a splitting decision will violate one of the style requirements. For instance, the heuristic is able to apply an extra penalty to the edge when not splitting between the previous token and the one being added.
There are some instances where we will never want to split the line, because
doing so will always be detrimental (i.e., it will require a backslash-newline,
which is very rarely desirable). For line (1), we will never want to split the
first three tokens: def
, xxxxxxxxxxx
, and (
. Nor will we want to
split between the )
and the :
at the end. These regions are said to be
"unbreakable." This is reflected in the tree by there not being a "split"
decision (left hand branch) within the unbreakable region.
Now that we have the tree, we determine what the "best" formatting is by finding the path through the tree with the lowest cost.
And that's it!
YAPF is not an official Google product (experimental or otherwise), it is just code that happens to be owned by Google.