This library abstracts over functional processing units represented as chainlinks. Each link in the chain is meant to be independent, idempotent, largely immutable, and highly testable.
- A
ChainLink
is an independent processing unit that receives an input and sends an output.- By using the
chain_link!
macro you can quickly construct the internals of the mapping from input to output.
- By using the
- A chain is a concatenation of
ChainLink
s (and other chains) and is a natural extension of this methodology for processing.- By using the
chain!
macro you can concatenateChainLink
s created bychain_link!
orchain!
.
- By using the
- A
chain!
macro permits parallel processing multipleChainLink
implementations, round-robin iterating over them perprocess
invocation.- If a
ChainLink
try_pop
returnsNone
, it will try the next one, etc.
- If a
You will want to determine what the smallest unit of processing your project consists of so that you can begin to create ChainLink
s. Defend the quality of your ChainLink
s by creating rigorous unit tests. After you have created a few ChainLink
s bring it all together with a chain!
.
Each type of processing unit (created by the chain_link!
macro) accept in an optional initializer, allowing for dependency injection. Now, it is possible to share dependencies between ChainLink
s of a chain, but that is highly discouraged without unit tests around the ChainLink
constructed by using the chain!
macro.
This example demonstrates how a ChainLink
may exist to pull records from a database and map them to a model. The pushing of IDs is designed to push faster into the ChainLink
than the pops occur to pull out the data. The database purposely takes longer to demonstrate how the system behaves asynchronously, pulling from the database while accepting in new IDs.
This example demonstrates how a file-loaded ETL process could be separated out into three ChainLink
s, all connected together as a Chain
, allowing you to pass in file paths and get back at the end if the current line processed was successful.
This example also covers basic usage of the nom
crate and how the initializer can be used as a mutable buffer.
This example is exactly like the ETL example, only that it also demonstrates splitting the final output between two databases using the parallel functionality of the chain!
macro.
This example demonstrates that an earlier ChainLink
may take in a group of input that will need to be parsed individually in a later ChainLink
. In other words, aggregation upstream can be merged together downstream.
This example demonstrates usage of the chain!
macro in a context where we might want one asynchronous process to run alongside another asynchronous process but such that they are not waiting for each other to complete before input is generally processed. Here, we want the controller to quickly be able to shutdown the robot while the camera sensor may take a while to provide data.
This example demonstrates how iterative processes can be utilized, especially with regards to mathematical operations.
This example demonstrates a simple order/work management system where customer orders and worker availability is paired up as they are provided. In a true work management system, the cache would exist in a database.
I have always wanted highly testable code and to work in an environment where the logic of my processes was absolutely dependable.
-
chain! parallel conditions
- This would allow the
try_pop
from oneChainLink
to make its way to different destinationChainLink
s based on a conditional block per destination, allowing logical, asynchronous splitting of processing.
- This would allow the
-
chain! nested sets
- The idea would be that you could do the following: chain!(SomeChain, String => String, [SomeChainLink => [OneSplit, AnotherSplit]: (one join) => FinalChainLink]: (all join))