Distinction between exists-at and occupies-temporal-region is unclear
Opened this issue · 1 comments
zhengj2007 commented
From HunterOn...@gmail.com on July 25, 2012 10:56:53
Barry says the difference is that occupies-temporal-region is maximal extent, where as exists-at doesn't have that property. Needs to get added to documentation.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=116
zhengj2007 commented
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on August 13, 2012 21:58:33
Agreed. Will check that next version of reference makes this clear, and that the comments make it to the OWL.
Status: Accepted
Owner: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
Labels: -Type-BFO2-OWL Type-BFO2-Reference