Adjacent_to removed from BFO?
Opened this issue · 1 comments
zhengj2007 commented
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on January 29, 2013 12:18:32
We had said at some point that it belongs in a spatial ontology. This issue is so that we can record an explicit decision about it.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=143
zhengj2007 commented
From cmung...@gmail.com on February 04, 2013 10:00:58
In use: RO_0002220
What would the corrosponding tenporalized version look like? Is there a general pattern for how to treat relations that would be symmetric at the bfo-fol level?
The symmetry characteristic would be present in at-some-times, but not at-all-times. There may be other temporally qualified variants that are stronger for which we can retain transitivity.