Compare reasoning performance of BFO2 temporalized relations against alternatives
Opened this issue · 0 comments
From cmung...@gmail.com on March 09, 2013 17:39:41
See Janna's email: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bfo-devel/4iW_pVjfVIM/P7ZA_zBRXPcJ (perhaps Janna can provide original file)
If groups plan to adopt BFO2, they should be prepared rather, than trying to fix problems as they occur.
The BFO2 group should have some kind of sense of the reasoning performance issues we might face moving forward. For example, we should benchmark each ontology with and without temporalized relations. For the benchmarking a naive rel <=> rel-at-all-times mapping could be automatically performed on test versions of each ontology. This should be a responsibility of the BFO2 group, not individual ontology maintainers. We would then use the data generated to prepare recommendations for handling issues that arise.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=158