fasta nomenclature vs fl_abundance PB nomenclature
Closed this issue · 0 comments
CCBenne commented
I supplied the -fl argument in which the associated .tsv file is in PB nomenclature. If I use the --froce_id_ignore argument I get "m64277e_221226_194658/78906085/ccs not found in FL count file. Assign count as 0." Or if I do not supply the --force_id_ignore argument then I get "Invalid input IDs! Expected PB.X.Y or PB.X.Y|xxxxx or PBfusion.X format but saw m64277e_221226_194658/2/ccs instead. Abort!".
My question is there a way to get past the different nomenclatures?