CoplayDev/unity-mcp

Upload to Unity Asset Store

Opened this issue · 12 comments

justinpbarnett commented

For increased visibility as well as ease-of-use, I would like to properly package and document this project and upload it to the Unity Asset Store.

yayapipi commented

will it be free on asset store?

justinpbarnett commented

will it be free on asset store?

Yes it will!!

  • 👍5
  • ❤️3
msanatan commented

Do not register or apply for registration of, and do not use, Unity Trademarks (or any confusingly similar Trademarks or translations or transliterations) for your business, your products, or your services, nor as any social media name or handle (e.g., hashtag) or as any part of any domain name.

Ref: https://unity.com/legal/branding-trademarks

We probably have to rename the project to Coplay MCP or something else, we're not allowed to use Unity's name in a product

CC @JosvanderWesthuizen @dsarno @Scriptwonder

dsarno commented

Maybe we can ask some folks at Unity if they will make an exception since it's open source and benefits them. I'm any case, I would hold off changing unless we're asked?

msanatan commented

Particularly on the asset store, we can't use "Unity" in the name. As the error message states "for Unity". But being called "Unity MCP" (understandably) makes it seem like we're affiliated with Unity when we're not.

Image

We don't need to change this repo's name's to be on the asset store unless they tell us to stop. However:

  • The namespace has to change, we cannot upload with "Unity" in the namespace #222
  • The menu item and window's title would have to be changed as well to pass the human review
msanatan commented

Looks like we publish as "MCP for Unity". That also works for the package name. Re-iterating, this repo's name will stay the same, but we're changing so we can publish on the asset store. How's that sound to you all?

dsarno commented

Sounds great. Thanks @msanatan

  • 👍1
Scriptwonder commented

Or, just a suggestion, make it little more creative like "MCP-U" or something similar? I'm good with the current name Marcus proposed also👍

  • 👍1
dsarno commented

Unity is good to have in the name for SEO and clarity of what the product is, unless they tell us to change it. No one is making money off it directly and it's open source, so I doubt it's high on their list of concerns at this point. Good to not proactively do something that could hurt it if we don't need to.

  • 👍1
msanatan commented
Image

It'll take some time, but let's goooo 🚀

  • 🎉1
dsarno commented

👏👏🍾

msanatan commented

Created some more tickets based on feedback from Unity. Big changes ahead 🙂