Coding conventions are... just conventions. They help to have a little fun with scripting, not to create new war/bias conversations.
Feel free to break the rules any time you can; it's important that you will always love what you would have written because scripts can be too fragile, too hard to maintain, or so many people hate them... And it's also important to have a consistent way in your scripts.
Don't use (smart-)
tabs. Replace a tab by two spaces.
Do not accept any trailing spaces.
Many editors can't and/or aren't configured to display the differences between tabs and spaces. Another person editor is just not your editor. Having spaces does virtually help a strange reader of your script.
There are inline
pipe and display
pipe. Unless your pipe is too
short, please use display
pipe to make things clear. For example,
This is an inline pipe: "$(ls -la /foo/ | grep /bar/)"
# The following pipe is of display form: every command is on
# its own line.
_foobar="$( \
ls -la /foo/ \
| grep /bar/ \
| awk '{print $NF}')"
_generate_long_lists \
| while IFS= read -r _line; do
_do_something_fun
done
When using display
form, put pipe symbol (|
) at the beginning of
of its statement. Don't put |
at the end of a line, because it's the
job of the line end (EOL
) character and line continuation (\
).
A variable is named according to its scope.
- If a variable can be changed from its parent environment,
it should be in uppercase; e.g,
THIS_IS_A_USER_VARIABLE
. - Other variables are in lowercase, started by an underscore;
e.g,
_this_is_a_variable
. The primary purpose of the underscore (_
) is to create a natural distance between the dollar ($
) and the name when the variable is used (e.g,$_this_is_a_variable
). This makes your code more readable, esp. when there isn't color support on your source code viewer. - Any local variables inside a function definition should be
declared with a
local
statement.
Example
# The following variable can be provided by user at run time.
D_ROOT="${D_ROOT:-}"
# All variables inside `_my_def` are declared with `local` statement.
_my_def() {
local _d_tmp="/tmp/"
local _f_a=
local _f_b=
# This is good, but it's quite a mess
local _f_x= _f_y=
}
Though local
statement can declare multiple variables, that way
makes your code unreadable. Put each local
statement on its own line.
FIXME
: Add flexibility support.
Name of internal functions should be started by an underscore (_
).
Use underscore (_
) to glue verbs and nouns. Don't use camel form
(ThisIsNotMyStyle
; use this_is_my_style
instead.)
Use two underscores (__
) to indicate some very internal methods aka
the ones should be used by other internal functions.
All errors should be sent to STDERR
. Never send any error/warning message
to aSTDOUT
device. Never use echo
directly to print your message;
use a wrapper instead (warn
, err
, die
,...). For example,
_warn() {
echo >&2 ":: $*"
}
_die() {
echo >&2 ":: $*"
exit 1
}
Do not handle error of another function. Each function should handle error and/or error message by their own implementation, inside its own definition.
_my_def() {
_foobar_call
if [[ $? -ge 1 ]]; then
echo >&2 "_foobar_call has some error"
_error "_foobar_call has some error"
return 1
fi
}
In the above example, _my_def
is trying to handle error for _foobar_call
.
That's not a good idea. Use the following code instead
_foobar_call() {
# do something
if [[ $? -ge 1 ]]; then
_error "${FUNCNAME[0]} has some internal error"
fi
}
_my_def() {
_foobar_call || return 1
}
$?
is used to get the return code of the last statement.
To use it, please make sure you are not too late. The best way is to
save the variable to a local variable. For example,
_do_something_critical
local _ret="$?"
# from now on, $? is zero, because the latest statement (assignment)
# (always) returns zero.
_do_something_terrible
echo "done"
if [[ $? -ge 1 ]]; then
# Bash will never reach here. Because "echo" has returned zero.
fi
$?
is very useful. But don't trust it.
Please don't use $?
with set -e
;)
Pipe stores its components' return codes in the PIPESTATUS
array.
This variable can be used only ONCE in the sub-{shell,process}
followed the pipe. Be sure you catch it up!
echo test | fail_command | something_else
local _ret_pipe=( "${PIPESTATUS[@]}" )
# from here, `PIPESTATUS` is not available anymore
When this _ret_pipe
array contains something other than zero,
you should check if some pipe component has failed. For example,
# Note:
# This function only works when it is invoked
# immediately after a pipe statement.
_is_good_pipe() {
echo "${PIPESTATUS[@]}" | grep -qE "^[0 ]+$"
}
_do_something | _do_something_else | _do_anything
_is_good_pipe \
|| {
echo >&2 ":: Unable to do something"
}
Always use set -u
to make sure you won't use any undeclared variable.
This saves you from a lot of headaches and critical bugs.
Because set -u
can't help when a variable is declared and set to empty
value, don't trust it twice.
It's recommended to emphasize the needs of your variables before your
script actually starts. In the following example, the script just stops
when SOME_VARIABLE
or OTHER_VARIABLE
is not defined; these checks
are done just before any execution of the main routine(s).
: a lot of method definitions
set -u
: "${SOME_VARIABLE}"
: "${OTHER_VARIABLE}"
: your main routine
Use set -e
if your script is being used for your own business.
Be careful when shipping set -e
script to the world. It can simply
break a lot of games. And sometimes you will shoot yourself in the foot.
If possible please have an option for user choice.
Let's see
set -e
_do_some_critical_check
if [[ $? -ge 1 ]]; then
echo "Oh, you will never see this line."
fi
If _do_some_critical_check
fails, the script just exits and the following
code is just skipped without any notice. Too bad, right? The code above
can be refactored as below
set -e
if _do_some_critical_check; then
echo "Oh, it's better now"
fi
echo "Oh, you will always see this line."
Now, if you expect to stop the script when _do_some_critical_check
fails
(it's the purpose of set -e
, right?), these lines don't help. Why?
Because set -e
doesn't work when being used with if
. Confused?
Okay, these lines are the correct one
set -e
if _do_some_critical_check; then
echo "Oh, it's better now"
else
echo "Something wrong we have to stop here"
exit 1 # or return 1
fi
set -e
doesn't help to improve your code: it just forces you to work hard,
doesn't it?
Another example, in effect of set -e
:
(false && true); echo not here
prints nothing, while:
{ false && true; }; echo here
prints here
.
The result is varied with different shells or even different versions of the same shell.
In general, don't rely on set -e
and do proper error handling instead.
For more details about set -e
, please read
There are lot of shell scripts that don't come with (unit)tests. It's just not very easy to write tests. Please keep that in mind: Writing shell scripts is more about dealing with runtime and side effects.
It's very hard to refactor shell scripts. Be prepared, and don't hate bash/shell scripts too much ;)
It would be very helpful if you can show in your script logs some tracing information of the being-invoked function/method.
Bash
has two jiffy variables LINENO
and FUNCNAME
that can help.
While it's easy to understand LINENO
, FUNCNAME
is a little complex.
It is an array of chained
functions. Let's look at the following example
funcA() {
log "This is A"
}
funcB() {
log "This is B"
funcA
}
funcC() {
log "This is C"
funcB
}
: Now, we call funcC
funcC
In this example, we have a chain: funcC -> funcB -> funcA
.
Inside funcA
, the runtime expands FUNCNAME
to
FUNCNAME=(funcA funcB funcC)
The first item of the array is the method per-se (funcA
),
and the next one is the one who instructs funcA
(it is funcB
).
So, how can this help? Let's define a powerful log
function
log() {
echo "(LOGGING) ${FUNCNAME[1]:-unknown}: *"
}
You can use this little log
method everywhere, for example, when funcB
is invoked, it will print
LOGGING funcB: This is B
First thing first: Use function
if possible. Instead of writting
some direct instructions in your script, you have a wrapper for them.
This is not good
: do something cool
: do something great
Having them in a function is better
_default_tasks() {
: do something cool
: do something great
}
Now in the very last lines of you script, you can execute them
case "${@:-}" in
":") echo "File included." ;;
"") _default_tasks ;;
esac
From other script you can include the script easily without executing any code:
# from other script
source "/path/to_the_previous_script.sh" ":"
(When being invoked without any argument the _default_tasks
is called.)
By advancing this simple technique, you have more options to debug your script and/or change your script behavior.
It's possible to generate beautiful self documentation by using grep
,
as in the following example. You define a strict format and grep
them:
_func_1() { #public: Some quick introduction
:
}
_func_2() { #public: Some other tasks
:
}
_quick_help() {
LANG=en_US.UTF_8
grep -E '^_.+ #public' "$0" \
| sed -e 's|() { #public: |☠|g' \
| column -s"☠" -t \
| sort
}
When you execute _quick_help
, the output is as below
_func_1 Some quick introduction
_func_2 Some other tasks
When someone tells you to do something, you may blindly do as said, or you would think twice then raise your white flag.
Similarly, you should give your script a white flag. A backup script
can't be executed on any workstation. A clean up job can't silently
send rm
commands in any directory. Critical mission script should
- exit immediately without doing anything if argument list is empty;
- exit if basic constraints are not established.
Keep this in mind. Always.
Bash
has a very powerful feature that you may have known:
It's very trivial to get definition of a defined method. For example,
my_func() {
echo "This is my function`"
}
echo "The definition of my_func"
declare -f my_func
# <snip>
Why is this important? Your program manipulates them. It's up to your imagination.
For example, send a local function to remote and excute them via ssh
{
declare -f my_func # send function definition
echo "my_func" # execution instruction
} \
| ssh some_server
This will help your program and script readable especially when you
have to send a lot of instructions via ssh
. Please note ssh
session
will miss interactive input stream though.
It's hard to remove files and directories correctly.
Please consider to use rm
with backup
options. If you use some
variables in your rm
arguments, you may want to make them immutable.
export _temporary_file=/path/to/some/file/
readonly _temporary_file
# <snip>
rm -fv "$_temporary_file"
In many situations you may have to answer to yourself whether you have
to use Bash
and/or Ruby/Python/Go/etc
.
One significant factor is that Bash
doesn't have a good memory.
That means if you have a bunch of data (in any format) you probably
reload them every time you want to extract some portion from them.
This really makes your script slow and buggy. When your script
needs to interpret any kind of data, it's a good idea to move forward
and rewrite the script in another language, Ruby/Python/Golang/...
.
Anyway, probably you can't deny to ignore Bash
:
it's still very popular and many services are woken up by some shell things.
Keep learning some basic things and you will never have to say sorry.
Before thinking of switching to Python/Ruby/Golang, please consider
to write better Bash scripts first ;)
In #7, Cristofer Fuentes suggests to use special names for arrays.
Personally I don't follow this way, because I always try to avoid
to use Bash array (and/or associative arrays), and in Bash
per-se there are quite a lot of confusion (e.g, LINENO
is a string,
FUNCNAME
is array, BASH_VERSION
is ... another array.)
However, if your script has to use some array, it's also possible to have special name for them. E.g,
declare -A DEPLOYMENTS
DEPLOYMENTS["the1st"]="foo"
DEPLOYMENTS["the2nd"]="bar"
As there are two types of arrays, you may need to enforce a better name
declare -A MAP_DEPLOYMENTS
Well, it's just a reflection of some idea from another language;)
See also in LESSONS.md
(https://github.com/icy/bash-coding-style/blob/master/LESSONS.md).
- Anybody can write good bash with a little effort
- Google - Shell Style Guide
- Defensive Bash programming
- Shellcheck
The original author is Anh K. Huynh and the original work was part of
TheSLinux
.
A few contributors have been helped to fix errors and improve the style. They are also the authors.
The work is released under a MIT license.