% Files: % - experiments/test_Ps.m: Calculates the P matrix and GP gain using % different methods. We can see that the results from different % methods are consistant however with a small r (e.g. r=10), GP does % not produce GLQR. But as r increases (e.g. r=100) GP approaches % GLQR. % - experiments/test_Ss.m: Same as experiments/test_Ps.m with similar % results but for S matrix and GL gain. Notice that in this case we % cannot increase the r too much because the number of parameters % (size of the S matrix) will increase dramatically as r increases. % - experiments/Eq58_Eq61_experiment.m: Shows that by changing RHS from % "RHS(i,:) = U_k" to "RHS(i,:) = U_k - (gamma^r)*U_kpr" we can % recreate the same exact result as analytical P from Numerical P. % This is an important result because it shows that Eq 30 is exact % and the extra part "(gamma^r)*U_kpr" only vanishes for the case % with large r and gamma<1. making gamma<1 a necessity if we are to % ignore the extra term (as they do in all RL literature). % Yet, adding the extra term still does not make the results of % numerical P consistent for complex problems :( % % % % % %