gensense is a current university project for the lecture Formal Semantics in Computational Linguistics at Heidelberg University during the winter semester of 2014/2015. This project was developed by Darmin Spahic and Sebastian Spaar.
Its goal is to assign "senses" to sentences, and thus be able to compare whether two given sentences have a similar meaning. Taking these two example sentences:
- "I fed the dog."
- "I fed the cat."
These two sentences' meanings are quite different, even though only a single word has been interchanged. Contrarily, "The dog was fed by me." is similar to sentence 1, but this time is using a different word order.
Humans can easily understand the similarity between sentence 1 and its passive form---computers, on the other hand, not so much. We try to implement some basic methods using the Python package gensim that allow us to extract the sense of a given sentence and compare them to others.
This project is written in Python 2.7.9 and mainly uses gensim's word2vec module (we can't use Python 3 since gensim seems to have some incompatibilities with Python 3.4.3).
Let's say we want to analyze the grade of similarity between these 3 sentences:
- "I fed the dog."
- "I fed the cat."
- "The dog was fed by me."
In sentence 1 and 2, the scene is the same, but the object is different (a different animal is fed, but the "action" is the same). However, one could argue that sentence 3 is a little bit closer in meaning to sentence 1, because it's the same scene and the same object---it is only expressed differently (by using a passive construction).
To calculate a vector that represent a full sentence's meaning, most current implementations do something like this: Look at each individual word, look up that word's vector, and add them up into a sentence vector. That is, if s is made up of w_1, w_2, etc.:
s = f(w_1, w_2, ..., w_n) s.t.
s = w_1 + w_2 + ... + w_n
Let's see what gensim would calculate for those 3 sentences' similarities. For this task, we used gensim to train a model on the text8 corpus. Keep in mind that the quality of word vectors depends heavily on the corpus used, and text8 is a relatively small corpus.
>>> import gensim
>>> text8 = gensim.models.word2vec.Text8Corpus("text8")
>>> model = gensim.models.word2vec.Word2Vec(text8, workers=4)
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed the dog".split(), "i fed the cat".split())
0.85966112715874687
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed the dog".split(), "the dog was fed by me".split())
0.77805009679743709
Our gensim model calculates a closer similarity between sentence 1 and 2 than between sentence 1 and 3. This is because our model uses the equation from above to calculate the sentence vector---simply adding every word vector up. In this case, the fact that sentence 3 consists of more words than sentence 1 already manipulates the resulting sentence vector, even though the senses are very similar to each other.
Another possibilty of calculating the sentence vectors is weighting each word differently, so that nouns, verbs, etc., contribute more to the sentence vectors than, say, stop words. For this reason, you may think it is clever to remove all stop words from a sentence (and we also implemented this functionality into gensense), however, have a closer look at sentence 3 again:
The dog was fed by me.
Most of this sentence's meaning is represented by the order of those "unimportant" stop words. If you remove all stop words, the resulting sentence might look like this:
(The) dog (was) fed (by) me. ---> dog fed me.
Other than (hilariously) changing the original meaning of that sentence, it is still problematic to feed these two sentences (stop words removed) into an additive model like the one used before:
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed dog".split(), "dog fed me".split())
0.85002439166352906
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed dog".split(), "i fed cat".split())
0.83910888572432696
We are a little bit closer to our goal that sentence 1 and sentence 3 have a closer similarity value with each other, but replace every instance of "dog" with "bird" and the problem still persists:
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed bird".split(), "i fed cat".split())
0.81879908349895825
>>> model.n_similarity("i fed bird".split(), "bird fed me".split())
0.81658789366759033
(Also keep in mind that we use the same, simple model every time, namely text8, and the quality of the word vectors change depending on the model. On top of that, all of those sentences are fairly short.)
This is where gensense comes in. In gensense, every sentence is analyzed and clustered into groups of similar meanings. The clustering algorithm is an implementation of the Chinese restaurant process. This way, we are looking to reduce a sentence's meaning to those words that play the most important role in a sentence. In case of sentence 1, this might be that "a dog is being fed", hence, dog + fed. For sentence 2 it is cat + fed. For sentence 3---since the action taking place is the same as in sentence 1---it is also dog + fed! While the rest of words (by, me, etc.) end up in another cluster.
>>> import gensense
>>> dog = gensense.sentence.Sentence("i fed the dog")
>>> dog_passive = gensense.sentence.Sentence("the dog was fed by me")
Let's see what clusters have been determined for these 2 sentences:
>>> dog.clusters
[['i', 'the'], ['fed', 'dog']]
>>> dog_passive.clusters
[['the', 'was'], ['dog', 'fed'], ['by'], ['me']]
We can see that our algorithm put dog and fed into the same cluster, and the other words in different ones. This way, comparing the meaning of sentence 1 and sentence 3 can be reduced to comparing the similarity of these clusters, which are of course the same:
>>> model.n_similarity("fed dog".split(), "dog fed".split())
1.0000000000000002
QED.
Due to the nature of the Chinese restaurant process, there is a certain amount of randomness involved in creating the clusters, especially for short sentences like sentence 1, 2 and 3. You can re-roll the dies by calling the clusterize() method:
>>> dog.clusterize()
>>> dog.clusters
[['i', 'the'], ['fed'], ['dog']]
As stated before, for short sentences this process is a little bit more on the random side. Compare this with a longer sentence (retrieved from nytimes.com on March 14th, 2015):
>>> text = "decades after dan jones last flight over vietnam ended in wreckage and blood his effort to see that his fallen marine crew members be honored is reaching its end"
>>> marine = gensense.sentence.Sentence(text)
>>> marine.clusters
[['decades', 'after', 'last', 'over', 'vietnam', 'ended', 'wreckage', 'his', 'effort', 'reaching', 'end'], ['dan', 'jones', 'members'], ['flight', 'marine', 'crew'], ['in', 'and', 'to', 'see', 'that', 'be', 'is'], ['blood'], ['fallen', 'its'], ['honored']]
>>> marine.clusterize()
>>> marine.clusters
[['decades', 'after', 'flight', 'vietnam', 'ended', 'effort', 'marine', 'crew', 'reaching', 'end'], ['dan', 'jones'], ['last', 'his', 'fallen', 'honored'], ['over', 'in', 'and', 'to', 'see', 'that', 'members', 'be', 'is'], ['wreckage', 'blood'], ['its']]
The clusterize() algorithm groups similar words into clusters, and adds those word vectors up into a cluster vector. While the cluster vectors can be calculated using any function that calculates sentence vectors (look into the API documentation below), right now, there is no possibility of weighting each cluster differently.
The gensim package is split into 3 parts: gensim.sentence, gensim.corpus and gensim.evaluation.
This module implements the Sentence object which wraps a sentence string and every vector of that sentence's words. A word2vec model supplies the word vectors. By default, gensense uses gensense.sentence.MODEL which is a model trained by gensim on the text8 corpus.
>>> import gensense
>>> dog = gensense.sentence.Sentence("i fed the dog")
If you have an own model trained by word2vec/gensim, pass it as a 2nd argument:
>>> dog = gensense.sentence.Sentence("i fed the dog", my_model)
Internally, every Sentence object is an OrderedDict which means you can access every word vector by using Sentence["key"]:
>>> dog["fed"]
array([ -2.32517533e-02, 1.27635270e-01, 1.52028486e-01,
6.63337559e-02, -1.57799542e-01, -3.17575276e-01,
7.05860704e-02, 4.00045291e-02, -1.94212601e-01,
...
], dtype=float32)
For every Sentence object, the * and + is overloaded to allow a simple weighting of individual words.
Other Sentence methods:
removeStopWords(self, stop_words=STOP_WORDS):: Iterates over the sentence and removes all words that are found instop_words. If no list is supplied, a default list of stop words from NLTK is used.clusterize(self): The implementation of the Chinese restaurant process. The sentence is grouped into smaller clusters of similar words. Each cluster has an independent cluster vector that can be used to calculate sentence similarities. This method creates the following fields:self.clusters: The list of clusters, each cluster is a list of words.self.cluster_sums: The list of cluster vectors.
This module is used to access Mitchell's & Lapata's evaluation corpus that is available here. For projects involving sentence similarities, this corpus is useful to have a comparison to one's own similarity calculations.
The corpus is initialized as an EvaluationCorpus object. When being initialized, it iterates over the text file, which looks something like this:
participant1 verbobjects 2 knowledge use influence exercise 5
participant1 verbobjects 2 war fight battle win 5
participant1 verbobjects 2 support offer help provide 7
participant1 verbobjects 2 technique develop power use 2
Every participant is put into EvaluationCorpus (a dictionary). Then, each line is parsed for the word pairs and the similarity grade, for instance:
participant1 verbobjects 2 knowledge use influence exercise 5
---> EvaluationCorpus["participant1"]: [["knowledge use", "influence exercise", 5]]
Internally, each word pair is also transformed in a Sentence object as described in gensense.sentence.
This module provides functions to compare sentences with each other, and a way to test these similarity functions on Mitchell's and Lapata's corpus.
The three most interesting functions here are probably similarity, compare, and evaluate_ml_corpus:
-
similarity(sentence1, sentence2, sv_function=sv_add): Takes two sentences, and calculates their similarity using the function provided (last argument). Any function that is able to calculate a sentence vector on aSentenceobject (for instance, by iterating overSentence.values()) can be used. By default, the sentence vector is calculated by simple addition of every word vector (sv_add), but we also provide three other functions:-
(
sv_add(sentence): Calculate sentence vector by adding each word vector up.) -
sv_weightadd(sentence, weights=WEIGHTS): Also adds each vector up into a sentence vector, but multiplies each vector by a scalar depending on their POS tag. These weights can be customized by providing a dictionary in the following format:weights = { 'NN': 0.9, 'JJ': 0.5, ... }Sample standard weights are in
gensense.evaluation.WEIGHTS. It is best to use adefaultdictfor this weight dictionary. -
sv_multiply(sentence): Creates a sentence vector by multiplying each i-th vector component of one word with each i-th component of the other word vectors. -
sv_kintsch(sentence, model=MODEL): Looks for the predicate in the sentence, and looks up the closest word of that predicate inmodel.modelshould be a model generated bygensimorword2vec. By default, the standard model ingensense.sentence.MODELis used.
-
-
compare(sentence1, sentence2, sv_function=sv_add): Similar to the function above (and might be merged in the future), but takes into account the word clusters of every sentence. Right now, this function asks you to choose the most relevant cluster, but this can be automated by training a neural network on it. -
evaluate_ml_corpus(corpus=ML_CORPUS, participant="participant1"): This function calculates the four similarity function (described above) on Mitchell's and Lapata's evaluation corpus. By default, the sentences as seen by participant 1 is used for calculation, but any other participant (of the 162) can be used by overridingparticipant=.Sample usage:
>>> gensense.evaluation.evaluate_ml_corpus(participant="participant162") 1st Sentence 2nd Sentence M&L + W.+ * K. -------------------- -------------------- ----- --- ----- --- ---- black hair right hand 1 2 1 2 2 high price low cost 1 6 5 6 6 social event special circumstance 1 2 1 3 2 small house important part 1 2 1 2 2 large number vast amount 6 5 3 4 5 certain circumstance economic condition 2 3 1 4 3 old person elderly lady 4 3 1 3 3 little room similar result 1 2 1 1 1 earlier work early stage 5 4 3 4 4 practical difficulty cold air 1 1 1 1 1 new law modern language 1 2 1 2 2 new body significant role 1 2 1 2 2 previous day long period 1 3 1 3 3 new technology public building 2 3 2 3 3 social activity whole system 1 2 1 2 2 general principle basic rule 4 4 2 3 4 northern region industrial area 1 3 2 4 3 new information general level 1 2 2 2 2 dark eye left arm 1 2 1 2 2 high point particular case 1 3 1 3 3 1st Sentence 2nd Sentence M&L + W.+ * K. ----------------- -------------------- ----- --- ----- --- ---- short time rural community 1 1 1 1 1 different kind various form 6 4 3 3 4 hot weather further evidence 1 1 1 1 1 central authority local office 1 3 2 2 3 economic problem new situation 1 3 1 4 3 effective way efficient use 5 5 2 4 5 new life early age 5 3 1 3 3 political action economic development 3 4 2 3 4 european state present position 1 3 2 3 3 early evening good effect 1 1 1 1 2 major issue american country 1 2 1 1 2 older man elderly woman 2 4 3 5 4 better job good place 3 4 2 3 4 federal assembly national government 6 5 4 5 5 whole country different part 1 3 1 4 3 large quantity great majority 5 3 1 2 3
- Mitchell & Lapata 2008: Vector-based Models of Semantic Composition: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P08-1028