FDOS/freecom

FreeCOM - Source - docs - html - commands - appendix.html

Closed this issue · 5 comments

There seems to be bad readable html code in appendix.html in the following sections:

a) batch scripts, section:
....When a batch file is invoked within another batch file, the previous ones
does not proceed once the called one terminates, regardless of the
nesting level; this is called chaining, one chains to another
program and does not intend to come back. To have a batch script behave
like an external program in this regard, it must be invoke via the
CALL command, e.g.: .....

The following example is not complete in my eyes. And it is almost not readable with an actual Browser.

b) same with section Pipes - examples.
.... EXAMPLES: EXAMPLE: 1 CMD: cmd1 | cmd2 | cmd3
Which is similiar to this sequence:
CMD: cmd1 >%TEMP%\t1 CMD: cmd2 <%TEMP%\t1 >%TEMP%\t2 CMD: DEL %TEMP%\t1 CMD: cmd3 <%TEMP%\t2 CMD: DEL %TEMP%\t2 EXAMPLE: 2 The first and last command can have an input or output redirection respectively, like so: ......

Not very important, but I wanted to send you a short hint.

Hello @fritzmueller, thanks for the report. The best way to get it to read how you would like is to submit a PR, then there's no guessing as to exactly what the correct wording should be.

Hi Andrew,
I assume PR should mean Private Response, all other translations by Google seem to be nonsense. And I found no way to send you a private response. Have a look at the screenshots and you will see that the browser handles most of the text in one line. If this should be correct, I big your pardon.
The example in section batch exits abrupt, see appendix 02 and 02b.
appendix01
appendix01b
appendix02
appendix02b

Hope you can follow me. Thx for reading.

I believe in this context PR means pull request. I will have a look at this report this weekend. Thanks.