ColorFull

A lightweight re-implementation of the color struct.

Why?

The color struct from .NET's System.Drawing is rather heavy when you really just want a container for red, green, blue and alpha values. This library aims to change that by providing easier to use methods and clearer names.

Game engines often re-implement this struct in their own way and this small package is meant to unify these implementations under a simpler type.

Getting started

You can use it the same way as System.Drawing.Color.

public void SomeShadyMethod()
{
    //Returns a color with red, green and blue values. Alpha is implicitly maxed out (255) by default
    var color1 = new Color(255, 255, 125);

    //Alpha is specified in this case 
    var color2 = new Color(68, 125, 200, 45);

    //You can also just use the initializer if you're one of those people who hate constructors. Omitting alpha also initializes it to 255 by default
    var color3 = new Color
    {
        Red = 250,
        Green = 128,
        Blue = 114
    };

    //Or you can also just specify it as well
    var color4 = new Color
    {
        Red = 250,
        Green = 128,
        Blue = 114,
        Alpha = 150
    };

    //Or if you really just want a red color with nothing else
    var color5 = new Color { Red = 255 };

    //If you liked color3 but wanted to adjust its blue value
    var color6 = color3 with { Blue = 189 };
}

Conversions

ToHtml : Converts your Color to an hexadecimal color code for use in HTML. Ex : color.ToHtml();
FromHtml : Takes an hexadecimal and converts it to an RGBA Color struct. Ex : Color.FromHtml("#FF5733");
Also contains an explicit convertor for ConsoleColor. Ex : var newColor = (ConsoleColor)color;

Compatibility with `System.Drawing.Color`

You can actually use it instead of System.Drawing.Color since it has an implicit conversion operator.

What that means is that whenever you use ColorFull.Color in a method that asks for System.Drawing.Color, .NET will automatically convert that ColorFull.Color to a System.Drawing.Color under the hood.

I wouldn't abuse it but it's there if you need it.

Did you seriously create a whole package just for a measly little struct?!

Yeah, I did. It might grow beyond that and include more eventually. Or not.