- Incur as least overhead as possible when using the access control decorators
- Only classes that use the decorators need to be changed, other related classes do not need to -> Can be opted-in easily
pip install pryvacy
The package provides 3 access control decorators: @private
, @public
, @protected
that can be used on methods and nested classes (currently only @private
can be used on nested classes)
from pryvacy import pryvacy, private, public, protected
@pryvacy
class Foo():
@public
def public_method(self):
pass
@protected
def protected_method(self):
pass
@private
def private_method(self):
pass
Access control rules:
- Methods inside
Foo
are able to accesspublic_method
,protected_method
,private_method
. - Code outside
Foo
and not inside anyFoo
's subclass methods can only accesspublic_method
. - Methods inside
Foo
's subclasses (either decorated with@pryvacy
or not) can accesspublic_method
andprotected_method
. - Nested classes methods can access
public_method
,protected_method
,private_method
.
Disclaimer: The package has not been tested thoroughly! Use with caution! Any contributions are appreciated~
- Currently, class-level code cannot access
protected_method
andprivate_method
. Example:
class Foo():
...
class Bar(Foo):
Foo().public_method() # OK!
Foo().protected_method() # Exception!
Foo().private_method() # Exception!
- The
test_back_and_forth
test is failing. This scenario is unlikely to happen but I will try to come up with a performant solution.
-
@private
and@protected
are not supported on nested classes yet. -
No way to enforce access policy on class and instance attributes.
-
Benchmark decorated classes
-
Test comprehensively the decorators interaction with the whole ecosystem
-
Implement @private and @protected on nested classes