- Clone git repository into a directory, then cd into that directory.
- Do a 'bundle install'.
- Do 'ruby ruined.rb'.
- The project should come alive at http://localhost:4567.
The average quality of the thing, as voted on by us.
- Range: 0 to 10
The average crumminess of the thing's fans, as voted on by us.
- Range: 0 to 10
The Average Quality minus the Average Fan Awfulness. If the fans are worse than the thing is good, it's possible for this to end up negative. Simply Put: This is the percieved quality of the thing, assuming the fans' opinions are weighted equally with the quality of the thing itself.
- Range: 10 to -10
Finding out what percentage of the Average Quality the Final Quality is and subtracting it from a hundred. Simply Put: The percentage of the thing's innate quality that the awful fans knock off.
- Range: 0 to 1100
The result of the following equation:
(averageQuality*5) + (degreeOfRuin/22)
This weights the Average Quality and Degree Of Ruin to a maximum 50 points apiece, for a potential total of 100. The higher the original quality, and the higher the degree to which the thing is ruined by its fans, the bigger a tragedy it is. If there was something we considered uncool with fans so cool that they make us look at it more favorably, this would end up negative. Simply put: The numerical amount from which a thing's fans detract from our perception of it.
- Range (for our sake, for now): 0 to 100
- How bad we think the things are to begin with
- How bad we think the things' fans are
- The weighted quality of a thing based on how bad its fans are
- The degree to which a thing's fans have made it worse
- How tragic that is, based on how cool the thing was to begin with
- Worst fans
- Most detrimental fans
- Biggest degree of tragedy
- Most and least cynical out of the three of us?
- Tens that were given
- Submissions
- Admin screen where we can edit scores and add items