JulienPeloton/s4cmb
Simulation of instrumental systematic effects in the context of CMB observations
PythonGPL-3.0
Issues
- 1
- 2
Main figure not visible with GitHub Dark mode
#61 opened by aboucaud - 0
Badge for JOSS
#59 opened by JulienPeloton - 4
JOSS paper
#56 opened by JulienPeloton - 0
Boresight pointing is bugged
#48 opened by JulienPeloton - 0
Add a linter
#51 opened by JulienPeloton - 0
Run continuous integration on pull requests
#53 opened by JulienPeloton - 2
- 1
Fix compilation issue with pyslalib
#46 opened by JulienPeloton - 0
Move the CI to GitHub Actions
#44 opened by JulienPeloton - 0
- 4
Pixels outside obspix with deep_patch
#33 opened by Helbouha - 2
Installation fails with `FATAL:/opt/local/bin/../libexec/as/x86_64/as: I don't understand 'm' flag!`
#11 opened by dpole - 1
Tests fail with numpy version. 1.14
#31 opened by JulienPeloton - 5
no origin/dichroic branch
#30 opened by MariaJK - 3
Atmospheric Noise
#18 opened by smsimon - 4
Instrument Configuration Options
#13 opened by smsimon - 4
Scan Implementation
#15 opened by smsimon - 5
Assertion Error in tod.py
#23 opened by joydidier - 2
Generalized beam?
#14 opened by smsimon - 3
Index error in detector_pointing.py
#19 opened by joydidier - 1
Implement deprojection of spurious signals
#22 opened by JulienPeloton - 1
Observed Pixels
#17 opened by smsimon - 1
- 13
loading s4cmb modules from NERSC jupyter
#16 opened by MariaJK - 2
Default ifort at NERSC does not support -openmp but default f2py (numpy v1.12.1) uses only it.
#12 opened by JulienPeloton - 1
Add demodulation of timestreams
#2 opened by JulienPeloton - 4
- 2
test suite -- are the flat and curved map in the tod.py tests really equal to within 1%? I see 2.5%
#4 opened by joydidier - 0