Repository for the experiments conducted in the papers Training Language Models for Programming Feedback Using Automated Repair Tools and Automated Program Repair using Generative Models for Code Infilling.
In this paper, we show a simple strategy to instantiate a sequence-to-sequence model for repairing student programs. The strategy consists of finetuning existing open models, such as those available on HuggingFace, using as ground truth the repairs found by Automated Repair Tools. We use CodeT5 as the sequence-to-sequence model.
In this paper, we experiment with using Code Generative Models augmented with infilling capabilities for the same task: repairing student programs. We conduct our experiments with the InCoder model from Facebook.
The student datasets used to conduct our experiments, as well as the model weights are available on HuggingFace.
The requirements.txt file can be used with pip to get the packages needed to run the codes.
pip install -r requirements.txt
Before running the experiments, make sure to adapt the configurations files to specify at least a saving directory, and, potentially, the path towards the location of your installation of the Refactory automated repair tool.
Training and evaluating the sequence to sequence model on the dublin dataset, and evaluating it's performance on three test datasets.
python run.py --experiment seq2seq --config config/seq2seq/dublin.json --train --test
python run.py --experiment seq2seq --config config/seq2seq/singapore.json --test
python run.py --experiment seq2seq --config config/seq2seq/newcaledonia.json --testTraining and evaluating the GMCI model on the dublin data
python run.py --experiment gmci --config config/gmci/dublin.json
python run.py --experiment gmci --config config/gmci/singapore.json
python run.py --experiment seq2seq --config config/gmci/newcaledonia.json --testThe final results can be obtained by running the results.ipynb jupyter notebooks