Made by Xinyu Chen • 🌐 https://twitter.com/chenxy346
Machine learning models make important developments in the field of spatiotemporal data modeling - like how to forecast near-future traffic states of road networks. But what happens when these models are built on incomplete data commonly collected from real-world systems (e.g., transportation system)?
In the transdim (transportation data imputation) project, we develop machine learning models to help address some of the toughest challenges of spatiotemporal data modeling - from missing data imputation to time series prediction. The strategic aim of this project is creating accurate and efficient solutions for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation and prediction tasks.
In a hurry? Please check out our contents as follows.
Missing data are there, whether we like them or not. The really interesting question is how to deal with incomplete data.
Figure 1: Two classical missing patterns in a spatiotemporal setting.
We create three missing data mechanisms on real-world data.
-
Missing data imputation 🔥
- Random missing (RM): Each sensor lost observations at completely random. (★★★)
- Non-random missing (NM): Each sensor lost observations during several days. (★★★★)
- Blockout missing (BM): All sensors lost their observations at several consecutive time points. (★★★★)
Figure 2: Tensor completion framework for spatiotemporal missing traffic data imputation.
- Spatiotemporal prediction 🔥
- Forecasting without missing values. (★★★)
- Forecasting with incomplete observations. (★★★★★)
Figure 3: Illustration of our proposed Low-Rank Autoregressive Tensor Completion (LATC) imputer/predictor with a prediction window τ (green nodes: observed values; white nodes: missing values; red nodes/panel: prediction; blue panel: training data to construct the tensor).
In this repository, we have adapted some publicly available data sets into our experiments. The original links for these data are summarized as follows,
- Multivariate time series
- Birmingham parking data set
- California PeMS traffic speed data set (large-scale)
- Guangzhou urban traffic speed data set
- Hangzhou metro passenger flow data set
- London urban movement speed data set (other cities are also available at Uber movement project)
- Portland highway traffic data set (including traffic volume/speed/occupancy, see data documentation)
- Seattle freeway traffic speed data set
- UTD19: Largest multi-city traffic data set
- Multidimensional time series
For example, if you want to view or use these data sets, please download them at the ../datasets/ folder in advance, and then run the following codes in your Python console:
import scipy.io
tensor = scipy.io.loadmat('../datasets/Guangzhou-data-set/tensor.mat')
tensor = tensor['tensor']
In particular, if you are interested in large-scale traffic data, we recommend PeMS-4W/8W/12W (see Large-scale traffic speed data sets in California, USA) and UTD19. For PeMS data, you can download the data from Zenodo and place them at the folder of datasets (data path example: ../datasets/California-data-set/pems-4w.csv
). Then you can use Pandas
to open data:
import pandas as pd
data = pd.read_csv('../datasets/California-data-set/pems-4w.csv', header = None)
For model evaluation, we mask certain entries of the "observed" data as missing values and then perform imputation for these "missing" values.
Old version, updated in 2019
In our experiments, we have implemented some machine learning models mainly on Numpy
, and written these Python codes with Jupyter Notebook. So, if you want to evaluate these models, please download and run these notebooks directly (prerequisite: download the data sets in advance).
- Our models
Task | Jupyter Notebook | Gdata | Bdata | Hdata | Sdata | Ndata |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Missing Data Imputation | BTMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
BGCP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
LRTC-TNN | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
BTTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
Single-Step Prediction | BTMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
BTTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
Multi-Step Prediction | BTMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
BTTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ |
- Baselines
Task | Jupyter Notebook | Gdata | Bdata | Hdata | Sdata | Ndata |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Missing Data Imputation | BayesTRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
TRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
BPMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
HaLRTC | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
TF-ALS | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
BayesTRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
BPTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
Single-Step Prediction | BayesTRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
TRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
BayesTRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
TRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
Multi-Step Prediction | BayesTRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 |
TRMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | |
BayesTRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | |
TRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ |
- ✅ — Cover
- 🔶 — Does not cover
- 🚧 — Under development
New version, updated in 2020
In the following implementation, we have improved Python codes (in Jupyter Notebook) in terms of both readiability and efficiency.
Our proposed models are highlighted in bold fonts.
- imputer (imputation models)
Notebook | Guangzhou | Birmingham | Hangzhou | Seattle | London | NYC | Pacific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
TRMF | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
BTRMF | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
BTMF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
BGCP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
BATF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
BTTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ |
HaLRTC | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
- predictor (prediction models)
Notebook | Guangzhou | Birmingham | Hangzhou | Seattle | London | NYC | Pacific |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMF | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
BTRMF | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🔶 | 🔶 |
BTRTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ |
BTMF | ✅ | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
BTTF | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | 🔶 | ✅ | ✅ |
For the implementation of these models, we use both
dense_mat
andsparse_mat
(ordense_tensor
andsparse_tensor
) as the inputs. However, it is not necessary by doing so if you do not hope to see the imputation/prediction performance in the iterative process, you can removedense_mat
(ordense_tensor
) from the inputs of these algorithms.
- Imputation example (on Guangzhou data)
(a) Time series of actual and estimated speed within two weeks from August 1 to 14.
(b) Time series of actual and estimated speed within two weeks from September 12 to 25.
The imputation performance of BGCP (CP rank r=15 and missing rate α=30%) under the fiber missing scenario with third-order tensor representation, where the estimated result of road segment #1 is selected as an example. In the both two panels, red rectangles represent fiber missing (i.e., speed observations are lost in a whole day).
- Prediction example
This is an imputation example of Low-Rank Tensor Completion with Truncated Nuclear Norm minimization (LRTC-TNN). One notable thing is that unlike the complex equations in our paper, our Python implementation is extremely easy to work with.
- First, import some necessary packages:
import numpy as np
from numpy.linalg import inv as inv
- Define the operators of tensor unfolding (
ten2mat
) and matrix folding (mat2ten
) usingNumpy
:
def ten2mat(tensor, mode):
return np.reshape(np.moveaxis(tensor, mode, 0), (tensor.shape[mode], -1), order = 'F')
def mat2ten(mat, tensor_size, mode):
index = list()
index.append(mode)
for i in range(tensor_size.shape[0]):
if i != mode:
index.append(i)
return np.moveaxis(np.reshape(mat, list(tensor_size[index]), order = 'F'), 0, mode)
- Define Singular Value Thresholding (SVT) for Truncated Nuclear Norm (TNN) minimization:
def svt_tnn(mat, tau, theta):
[m, n] = mat.shape
if 2 * m < n:
u, s, v = np.linalg.svd(mat @ mat.T, full_matrices = 0)
s = np.sqrt(s)
idx = np.sum(s > tau)
mid = np.zeros(idx)
mid[:theta] = 1
mid[theta:idx] = (s[theta:idx] - tau) / s[theta:idx]
return (u[:,:idx] @ np.diag(mid)) @ (u[:,:idx].T @ mat)
elif m > 2 * n:
return svt_tnn(mat.T, tau, theta).T
u, s, v = np.linalg.svd(mat, full_matrices = 0)
idx = np.sum(s > tau)
vec = s[:idx].copy()
vec[theta:] = s[theta:] - tau
return u[:,:idx] @ np.diag(vec) @ v[:idx,:]
- Define performance metrics (i.e., RMSE, MAPE):
def compute_rmse(var, var_hat):
return np.sqrt(np.sum((var - var_hat) ** 2) / var.shape[0])
def compute_mape(var, var_hat):
return np.sum(np.abs(var - var_hat) / var) / var.shape[0]
- Define LRTC-TNN:
def LRTC(dense_tensor, sparse_tensor, alpha, rho, theta, epsilon, maxiter):
"""Low-Rank Tenor Completion with Truncated Nuclear Norm, LRTC-TNN."""
dim = np.array(sparse_tensor.shape)
pos_missing = np.where(sparse_tensor == 0)
pos_test = np.where((dense_tensor != 0) & (sparse_tensor == 0))
dense_test = dense_tensor[pos_test]
del dense_tensor
X = np.zeros(np.insert(dim, 0, len(dim))) # \boldsymbol{\mathcal{X}}
T = np.zeros(np.insert(dim, 0, len(dim))) # \boldsymbol{\mathcal{T}}
Z = sparse_tensor.copy()
last_tensor = sparse_tensor.copy()
snorm = np.sqrt(np.sum(sparse_tensor ** 2))
it = 0
while True:
rho = min(rho * 1.05, 1e5)
for k in range(len(dim)):
X[k] = mat2ten(svt_tnn(ten2mat(Z - T[k] / rho, k), alpha[k] / rho, np.int(np.ceil(theta * dim[k]))), dim, k)
Z[pos_missing] = np.mean(X + T / rho, axis = 0)[pos_missing]
T = T + rho * (X - np.broadcast_to(Z, np.insert(dim, 0, len(dim))))
tensor_hat = np.einsum('k, kmnt -> mnt', alpha, X)
tol = np.sqrt(np.sum((tensor_hat - last_tensor) ** 2)) / snorm
last_tensor = tensor_hat.copy()
it += 1
if (it + 1) % 50 == 0:
print('Iter: {}'.format(it + 1))
print('MAPE: {:.6}'.format(compute_mape(dense_test, tensor_hat[pos_test])))
print('RMSE: {:.6}'.format(compute_rmse(dense_test, tensor_hat[pos_test])))
print()
if (tol < epsilon) or (it >= maxiter):
break
print('Imputation MAPE: {:.6}'.format(compute_mape(dense_test, tensor_hat[pos_test])))
print('Imputation RMSE: {:.6}'.format(compute_rmse(dense_test, tensor_hat[pos_test])))
print()
return tensor_hat
- Let us try it on Guangzhou urban traffic speed data set:
import scipy.io
tensor = scipy.io.loadmat('../datasets/Guangzhou-data-set/tensor.mat')
dense_tensor = tensor['tensor']
random_tensor = scipy.io.loadmat('../datasets/Guangzhou-data-set/random_tensor.mat')
random_tensor = random_tensor['random_tensor']
missing_rate = 0.2
### Random missing (RM)
sparse_tensor = dense_tensor * np.round(random_tensor + 0.5 - missing_rate)
- Run the imputation experiment:
import time
start = time.time()
alpha = np.ones(3) / 3
rho = 1e-5
theta = 0.30
epsilon = 1e-4
maxiter = 200
tensor_hat = LRTC(dense_tensor, sparse_tensor, alpha, rho, theta, epsilon, maxiter)
end = time.time()
print('Running time: %d seconds'%(end - start))
This example is from ../experiments/Imputation-LRTC-TNN.ipynb, you can check out this Jupyter Notebook for advanced usage.
-
Time series forecasting
-
Time series imputation
-
Xinyu Chen, Yixian Chen, Nicolas Saunier, Lijun Sun (2021). Scalable low-rank tensor learning for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. [preprint] [data] [Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Mengying Lei, Nicolas Saunier, Lijun Sun (2021). Low-rank autoregressive tensor completion for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation. arXiv: 2104.14936. [preprint] [data & Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Lijun Sun (2021). Bayesian temporal factorization for multidimensional time series prediction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. (Early access) [preprint] [DOI] [slides] [data & Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Lijun Sun (2020). Low-rank autoregressive tensor completion for multivariate time series forecasting. arXiv: 2006.10436. [preprint] [data & Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Jinming Yang, Lijun Sun (2020). A nonconvex low-rank tensor completion model for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 117: 102673. [preprint] [DOI] [data & Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Zhaocheng He, Yixian Chen, Yuhuan Lu, Jiawei Wang (2019). Missing traffic data imputation and pattern discovery with a Bayesian augmented tensor factorization model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 104: 66-77. [preprint] [DOI] [slides] [data] [Matlab code] [Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Zhaocheng He, Lijun Sun (2019). A Bayesian tensor decomposition approach for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 73-84. [preprint] [DOI] [data] [Matlab code] [Python code]
-
Xinyu Chen, Zhaocheng He, Jiawei Wang (2018). Spatial-temporal traffic speed patterns discovery and incomplete data recovery via SVD-combined tensor decomposition. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 86: 59-77. [DOI] [data]
This project is from the above papers, please cite these papers if they help your research.
Xinyu Chen 💻 |
Jinming Yang 💻 |
Yixian Chen 💻 |
Mengying Lei 💻 |
Lijun Sun 💻 |
Tianyang Han 💻 |
- Principal Investigator (PI)
Lijun Sun 💻 |
Nicolas Saunier 💻 |
See the list of contributors who participated in this project.
Our transdim is still under development. More machine learning models and technical features are going to be added and we always welcome contributions to help make transdim better. If you have any suggestion about this project or want to collaborate with us, please feel free to contact Xinyu Chen (email: chenxy346@gmail.com) and send your suggestion/statement. We would like to thank everyone who has helped this project in any way.
Recommended email subjects:
- Suggestion on transdim from [+ your name]
- Collaboration statement on transdim from [+ your name]
If you have any questions, please feel free to create an issue.
This research is supported by the Institute for Data Valorization (IVADO).
This work is released under the MIT license.